I don't understand ppl on the forum

Mess Room
11

Because you are considering everything except 3 different classes in row as spam. Which is quite hilarious.
You want to force others to play different claases which they’re not enjoy. Even after hours of grind.

I really don’t know why is it problem to play 3 assaulters squads or 3 tanks squads in line up.
I really don’t know how is this ruining fun for you. That’s all. I just don’t see it as problem.

I don’t want to be forced 4 different classes before I can take my favourite one again. It’s just nonsense to me.

12

And this is wy you cant read because you compared to the other dont understand a shit about the discussion you only read wtfk you want and think is the truth

Spoiler: is not

13

Those players who get 3 kills all game

14

Maybe it’s because your english is too poor to properly explain it. So you rather start being rude and toxic.
Whatever.

15

Sure bro as you said, cant wait next topic wen people tell you to read, i need screenshot for make the meme

16

That’s the issue. Not ppl spaming stuff but ppl spaming strong stuff and forcing other ppl to adjust.

4 Likes
17

Yeah, that’s classic competitive mentality in on-line games. It’s called meta and it will exist always, especially in F2P games.

18

Yeah, and I want it go away or at least not be strong enough to spoil my fun.

Basically I want meta to be weak enough to not be worth sacryficing my fun BUT without nerfing weapons to oblivion like devs tried yesterday.

2 Likes
19

True This is the issue

There is no problem if people do it in high-end matches they have all the rigth to do it aganaist people who want do or do the same, like people who dont want do it have the rigth to play in the way they like

A solution is probably an high BR restrictions on equipment for forcefully separate different type of spam in different BR

Or

Remove dispersion and adust damage of gun for make them kill in almost 1 or 2 hit
…

There are different way for ensure thath everyone can play how they want withaut nerf the overall equipment or add heavy restrictions and limitation

1 Like
20

It would be nice, but I don’t think it’s possible.
Tho I have nothing against your never ending efforts to end/weakened meta. Until it doesn’t affects in greater scheme what’s fun for me.
Tho I would still respect you have different opinion. Then it’s up to devs to decide what’s better. I don’t want it to be personal between us.

2 Likes
21

when i play normandy i have to take tiger or p47 with max smg/AR loadout and maybe fire squad, cause if i dont take it other dipshits who play meta will have big advantage over me. and then other players do the same cause of me and similar people.
that is why i am happy with BR MM cause i want to play low tier weapons and vehicles without opponents having drastically better weaponry.

5 Likes
22

I agree but sadly BR MM will also cause loose of variety.

Personally I don’t want to get stomped with superior equipment but I don’t mind facing stronger oponent from time to time.

Actually I’d like to see one or two T-34s per low BR match as kind of a “boss fight”.
Just to spice things up.

That’s why I spam my crazy idea about deployment points. Keo said no to it but I believe in my cause.

23

you probably will, it’s widely known that BRMM is more of a soft rule

24

Probably more than from time to time.

We have to wait and see.

1 Like
25

For beginners and in games that are not so intensive, I don’t mind and never blame them. I hate those get powerful weapons(AVS-36 sniper, AVT-40 etc.) but hiding behind.
BUT for many games, you will fight only find yourself stuggling. Since this is a team game, and if we won we could get 10 mans happy; if we lose, only those who live on snipering and AAA and mortar and engineers could feel happy while others frustrated.
Snipers, mortars and engineers are only for beginners to get through the first a few levels. After getting powerful weapons like Lanchester or MG34, they have to take more responsibility, not a camping baby.
Of course you can play STG-44 or MKb-42 snipers for assulting, not for camping.
This game is a cap game, no a camp game.
And I can say those snipers and engineers cannot help team more than use MG or SMG. They died 10+ squads and get no capture points. If I have snipers I can get more kills, I can shoot tank commanders and I can mark enemy attacking position. For those snipers always hiding, they just wanna get easy-kills and dare not to fight like a soilder.

1 Like
26

You know, maybe, just maybe there is a chance that you can be effective as a sniper squad in this game.

However in 90 % of the cases those players simply suck.

So why shouldn’t we be mad at our mates who camp in their greyzone while they actually need to attack?

This has nothing to do with us wanting to restrict anyone. Instead some sort of buff or better rework for those squads would make sense.

27

Last time I saw it ppl were literalry trashing other player.
It didn’t look like a “buff suggestion” to me.

1 Like
28

Well, yes thats the point, you trash the players not the unit class.

29

Because it’s simple, playing passively hurts the team, if we were to reward players as individuals then I wouldn’t care or force other players to cooperate

The fun part idk, that’s subjective, some ppl have fun spawnkilling and running meta squads (me) and some have fun making their team lose

Until a fair and just system of rewarding is implimented ,I will continue to shout at passive players who are essentialy dead weight to the team

2 Likes
30

I will never understand this mindset sniper can murder people running from the distance much quicker than most campaign assaulters and rifleman, he can counter other snipers and also stop any attempt at flanking. With engineers you will be running for hours with no spawn points, they can hold back enemies almost forever with their ammo crates and AT/AA guns (they are useful also while attacking)