The devs have not released the Q&A document, so we have no information on this. You’ll have to wait until it comes out.
Personally, I think no compensation is needed. Yeah it sucks that you grinded the MP40 five times, but you’re gonna keep all the MP40s that you bought with silver orders, so it’s not that big of a deal.
And for those people who bought levels with gold, no compensation is needed because they could have been unlocked for free. It’s also ridiculously overpriced to buy campaign levels, I don’t know why anyone would. Premium account is way more valuable.
2 Likes
Well new campaigns etc, id say there has been quite alot of major big changes already.
Game would be relatively shit if it had simply stayed in OBT state.
Why should they ? You played moscow, got Mp40 good for you and you got to play moscow with it
You unlocked mp40 in berlin & played berlin with it.
And with your logic, you never unlocked FG42 but now ur somehow magically entitled to have it due to having 2 mp40 in different campaigns ?
So?Is there your dad in the production team?
3 Likes
Maybe you are all blind / dont want to see, but - it is about the campaign progress, not the “five MP 40 in five different campaigns”.
If someone paid money to unlock MP 40, he did not paid it only for the MP 40 but for speeding up the whole progression system.
It means - he will get MG 42 sooner, Panther G sooner, StG 44 sooner and so on.
Someone have spent the money to save the time and that is all.
5 Likes
Dont exactly see the problem here either as he got exactly what he paid for, Mp40 sooner.
He also gets to keep that Mp40.
3 Likes
I’m sure the new system will go the WT route and eventually pad the research tree with five+ identical MP40 variants you need to research and upgrade individually to unlock the next gun in line.
To those players who are protecting Gaijin regarding this issue, you are voting against your own best interests. Would you respond the same way in real life if you paid for something and the company simply took it away? I don’t think so… Otherwise, you’re just giving your money away to a company as if it’s a charity. So in the future, simply send Gaijin your money; skip the step of actually receiving something in return—because that’s what you’re asking all of us to do right now regarding Stalingrad & the Pacific campaigns: Make a donation instead of a purchase.
Except with Stalingrad you are gonna get more than what you paid for.
- 3 Slots (or 6) that you can use permanently across the whole game, not just Stalingrad (they might even be universal slots)
- Keep all your premiums, all gear and troops
the only other thing that was of value was XP and 4 star troopers/equipment. But that was only temporary because once you have leveled, or bought them…its moot. its worthless (same applies to pacific)
Now I’m not saying you are wrong, But There are different ways of looking at it that has got nothing to do with defending the developers.
As a player that finished the leveling process in Stalingrad a long time ago, I feel like I’m getting the better end of the deal.
It “is in my best interest”
1 Like
Getting more? lmao… ya ok
3 slots that can be used in berlin, stalingrad, normandy, tunisia, moscow. (Maps)
All my fully upgraded troops, gear and vehicles can be used aswell
Is that not more than just in stalingrad?
1 Like
No one’s “protecting gaijin”… we just know what’s a scam and what isn’t.
When you bought the Stalingrad pack, you paid for all that stuff for that one campaign. It’s fair to say most people bought it for the xp boost. Once the campaign was finished, the xp boost becomes useless.
Now, not only are you keeping your slots which are the monetary equivalent of the entire pack, you are now able to take your slots as well as your upgraded squads, soldiers, weapons, and vehicles into every campaign that features the Soviets or the Germans, as well as any that may come in the future such as the battle of France or the Winter War. How is that not fair?
They’re making the best out of a bad situation.
1 Like
Again I m not protecting no one… He got what he paid for regarding the levels
“I m gonna pay to skip this level”. He got what he paid for.
If they give some compensation cool for everyone, if they don’t, cool for me either way…
I have stated nothing on Stalingrad or pacific. I m in regards of current levels on normal campaigns.
I don’t understand why having a positive opinion about something one must be protecting or not caring about everyone.
If you feel you deserve more, ask for more. I m sure the community will back you up. Changes nothing in my point of view.
Either way I won’t change My opinion coz you feel the other way.
You only view it as untrue because it doesn’t conform to your beliefs. Like Shiivex said:
We can be optimistic without “being paid by the company”. If you want more compensation than what you got, by all means speak up, but telling people they are mentally challenged because they don’t agree with you is not a good way to get them to join your cause.
1 Like
There’s no point in arguing with them if they can’t understand the logic behind your reasoning. They’re just corporate shills or trolls trying to get a reaction. You can see certain names doing this anyways over and over.
2 Likes
Additions are not changes to what’s considered core to the game. You’re either misunderstanding the points, or just being intentionally dull.
Not sure whats problem then as the new matchmake & progression tree can be considered as addition with that logic.
So the game never had matchmaking or progression before, ok. Totally new concept here.
Lol thats kinda low to come up with.
Just felt it needed to be said again…the amount of times people think its gone…