Historical accuracy in Enlisted

[TUSUPOLISI69]

@Barendd1974

Well considering that most people using the “historical accuracy” argument are referring to equipment

And which part of historical accuracy is this ?
Is it the one that wishes to keep the game we have aka full squads with smg’s but with equipment that fits the timeline ?
Or is it the one that wants historical accuracy to that extend that those SMG’s are limited like actually historically correct ?

@Barendd1974

not gameplay, I don’t think it’s relevant to that, despite it needing a fix. (I’m tired of my bots standing in fire trying to stop being on fire)

Well the AI response was mostly pointed out to ww2 atmosphere which I dont recall ever existed in this game.
Due to AI.

@Barendd1974

So it’s going to become a lazy cash grab, gotcha.

Probably ? If its what pays the bills.

@Barendd1974

Numbers are probably wrong unless DF actually posts them. Not everyone that plays the game gives feedback. Considering in regards to a major large update that will literally change the entire game as we know it, the people who want historical accuracy are now in the majority in regards of people who give feedback should mean something.

Okay so do you happen to have some sort of numbers ? Like amount of forum users ? Or anything in that regard that could support your claim of majority ?

[Blegh2022]

@RussianPuts

Your statement is objectively false.

No, it’s not.
The devs themselves said they never intended the game to be historically accurate

@Barendd1974

Never supposed to be historically accurate, yet had an advertisement on the front page for over a year. They purposefully catered to this crowd and are now surprised when they go back on it, and it has a large backlash.

Nothing about that says anything about historical accuracy.

“Gives the feeling of participating in a real military battle”
The game does that.

“re-creates the atmosphere of the Second World War”
The game does that.

The game hasn’t been historically accurate, ever.

Copied from this thread

Historical accuracy nobody likes

Realistic aiming Gun jams High gun cost Ammo cost Tiger II bad quality armor Unbalanced sides Explosive packs weren’t used TNT in most of campaigns wasn’t used Mines weren’t used by basic infantry Second slot isn’t a thing 2km run for the objective WP spam also isn’t historically accurate And no semi-auto and full-auto spam

• Realistic aiming
• Gun jams
• High gun cost
• Ammo cost
• Tiger II bad quality armor
• Unbalanced sides
• Explosive packs weren’t used
• TNT in most of campaigns wasn’t used
• Mines weren’t used by basic infantry
• Second slot isn’t a thing
• 2km run for the objective
• WP spam also isn’t historically accurate
• And no semi-auto and full-auto spam

Panzer IV F2’s weren’t in Moscow, but here they are.

You want historical accuracy, find another game. It was never intended to be historically accurate.

[RussianPuts]

Literally read what Barendd1974 just cited you. It obviously implies some historical accuracy.
Ah yes, because as we all know keofox is definitely very trustworthy.

Nothing about that says anything about historical accuracy.

Like I said, it is implied. Love how you conveniently omitted ‘‘and is careful with details’’ btw.

The game hasn’t been historically accurate, ever.

False. The issue here is that you like to cherry pick mistakes the devs implemented either as a result of them not noticing it or peer pressure from you types and then use that as ‘‘evidence’’ that this game was never meant to be historically accurate.

You like many others who are so bothered by our valid criticisms are just conflating our want for some historical accuracy for this needing to be a full-on milsim or another HLL.

[RussianPuts]

Just a heads up, this is someone who likes to pull strawmen out of nowhere, assume your race or where you live just because of your name, and is almost incoherent.

[Blegh2022]

@RussianPuts

It obviously implies some historical accuracy.

Which the game has.
Weapons, vehicles, uniforms, maps are all have some historical accuracy

@RussianPuts

Like I said, it is implied. Love how you conveniently omitted ‘‘and is careful with details’’ btw.

Still haven’t shown where it’s said," You’ll never see a Tiger 2 in Moscow, because that’s not historically accurate.

@RussianPuts

You like many others who are so bothered by our valid criticisms are just conflating our want for some historical accuracy for this needing to be a full-on milsim or another HLL.

Don’t like it, don’t play.
Not our fault you would rather the game die for the sake of historical accuracy

[Blegh2022]

@RussianPuts

Right now to about the same level as COD Vanguard

Are we running around with bunny costumes, slide canceling and bunny hopping? Didn’t think so

[Blegh2022]

@RussianPuts

How about you look up the definition of ‘‘implied’’ and try again. As this literally doesn’t disprove what I said.

suggested but not directly expressed

Doesn’t suggest what you’re saying it does, but keep reaching

@RussianPuts

But hey, if this is the game you wanna play then cite where they said ‘‘You’ll most definitely see a Tiger 2 in Moscow’’

They didn’t. Now, cite where they said," You’ll most definitely not see a Tiger 2 in Moscow"

@RussianPuts

This game’s target audience are those who want historical accuracy in their games, not you. You fucking leave.

Obviously it’s not.

@RussianPuts

It won’t die as a result of implementing historical accuracy, retard. Stop lying.

It’s already dying pal

[RussianPuts]

Not yet anyway.

[Blegh2022]

Not ever.

[RussianPuts]

No it wasn’t a fucking suggestion you lying shit. They were advertising it as such.

It’s already dying pal

Not for the reason you think, dingus.

[Blegh2022]

@RussianPuts

No it wasn’t a fucking suggestion you lying shit. They were advertising it as such.

Show me

[RussianPuts]

Someone here already did, dumbass.

[Blegh2022]

@RussianPuts

Not for the reason you think, dingus.

Game is dying because of crappy progression and poor balance (caused due to equipment being locked to campaigns.
Real life is not balanced, historical accuracy is not balanced)

Hell Let Loose is leaps and bounds ahead of Enlisted in terms of historical accuracy.
Shit time travels in that.

[Blegh2022]

No, they didn’t, they just showed a screenshot that accurately advertised the game and tried to push their own agenda into it

[RussianPuts]

That image proves you wrong, dipshit.

[Blegh2022]

It proves me right

[RussianPuts]

historical accuracy is not balanced

I can be, you clowns just don’t want historical accuracy.

[RussianPuts]

It proves that you should’ve been euthanized.

[Blegh2022]

Realistic Tiger 2 is not balanced.
Realistic KV-1 is not balanced.
Realistic KV-2 is not balanced.
Realistic Americans are not balanced.

[RussianPuts]

Just because they aren’t now doesnt mean it isnt possible to make them, retard.