suggested but not directly expressed
Doesn’t suggest what you’re saying it does, but keep reaching
They didn’t. Now, cite where they said," You’ll most definitely not see a Tiger 2 in Moscow"
Obviously it’s not.
It’s already dying pal
Not yet anyway.
Not ever.
No it wasn’t a fucking suggestion you lying shit. They were advertising it as such.
It’s already dying pal
Not for the reason you think, dingus.
Show me
Game is dying because of crappy progression and poor balance (caused due to equipment being locked to campaigns.
Real life is not balanced, historical accuracy is not balanced)
Hell Let Loose is leaps and bounds ahead of Enlisted in terms of historical accuracy.
Shit time travels in that.
No, they didn’t, they just showed a screenshot that accurately advertised the game and tried to push their own agenda into it
It proves me right
historical accuracy is not balanced
I can be, you clowns just don’t want historical accuracy.
1 Like
It proves that you should’ve been euthanized.
1 Like
Realistic Tiger 2 is not balanced.
Realistic KV-1 is not balanced.
Realistic KV-2 is not balanced.
Realistic Americans are not balanced.
Just because they aren’t now doesnt mean it isnt possible to make them, retard.
1 Like
It isn’t possible to make that balanced while also maintaining historical accuracy.
You don’t even know anything about the very thing you’re mad about them removing (there was barely anything there in the first place)
Just because you say so doesnt make it true, dummy.
you don’t even know anything about the very thing you’re mad about them removing
Don’t project. You’re the one who thinks that just because we want historical accuracy that we want a full on simulator.
1 Like
You never actually responded to my post. So if you legitimately think it proves your point, I would like you to dissect it and prove to me how it does. I’m curious to see how “re-creates the atmosphere of the Second World War and is careful with details” means something other than immersion and accuracy.
If they somehow meant ahistorical battles and a non-immersive feeling from that, then please justify how it does. Because unless you can, maybe it’s you who’s trying to push an agenda and not me?
Well atmosphere is ruined by AI, its quite impossible to imagine ww2 fought by dummies that cant even stay in trench.
Is this intentional ? Probably not, doesnt change the fact that it ruins the atmosphere rather completely.
What details ?
Only thing they got somewhat right is the weapons names, nothing else in them resembles theyr actual irl counterpart.
Is this said banner from past removed ? Yes it is.
Is it because they figured out they cannot fix the game to meet the “standards” ? I dont know
Is it because they figured out that theres as many “historical accuracy” views as theres people speaking of it and thus cant please them all ? I dont know
Was it false marketing, probably.
Does it change the fact that far as I can remember this game never was historically accurated. No.
1 Like
At least you’re civil.
It makes you feel like you’re in a WW2 battle.
Sure, it’s not completely accurate. People weren’t running around with LMGs gunning down everyone else, and the tanks were a lot tougher irl than in the game. But, it still makes me feel like I could be in a battle
The gunfire, the explosions, the soldiers. It makes a very believable atmosphere, at least for me
The weapons look like their real life counterparts, and for the most part, act like them (within reason of course so the game is balanced)
Maps looks accurate to their campaigns, tanks feel strong (but as I said above, weak enough so they aren’t OP)
Uniforms look accurate as well.
So why wouldn’t they prove the AI instead of doubling down on how bad it is and ruining the atmosphere worse. For me personally, I’d like to see the AI no be completely braindead.
This one has, though it’s more so for the people who claim “Enlisted has never promised to be historically accurate”
Considering the Bipods still being broken now, it might very well be the issue.
If they completely abandon it by going down the path they’re going, then yes. They did a kickstarter and charged people around $40 on average for premiums with these promises of what the game will be. They are now trying to attract a more casual audience and abandon the core of which they initially advertised (that being an accurate WW2 arcade shooter).