And at very fist game where you encounter absolutely retarded AI such atmosphere is long gone, if it ever even existed in first place.
In these 1-3 years ? The only accurated thing this game has had was the names of guns.
This havent changed at all.
One wants actual accuracy to that degree that squads are set in correct form.
BA’s, 1 smg maybe 1 mg
Another wants this game we have but no “time travellers”
Next wants the same but to keep the “time travellers” that “could have been there” regardless no prove of theyr existence there has been shown.
Then theres that one guy who found out that 1 soldier has sport-lace shoelaces and simply cannot play the game untill this horrendous uniform error is fixed.
And so on, so it doesnt seem like very unified front.
Probably it should have been done long ago ? Its quite hard to speak of historical accuracy, realism or ww2 atmosphere when part of coregame the AI is absolutely retarded.
Quite sure they have now chosen to stay on the arcade path since its alot easier, gives them more room to fiddle around and at last EULA that grants them right to turn this into farmville & my little pony fusion game if they wish.
Well isnt it obvious ? Ofc we should make 67 ( was that the number of likes ? ) different matchmakers to please them all because that just makes sense.
Okay well
Id say these numbers are highly inflated but who knows ? But lets assume closer number would be 10% ? Of the estimated numbers.
That would be roughly 3k and the forum post you are referring to has 67? Likes, you can do the math it just doesnt really sound like majority.
Well considering that most people using the “historical accuracy” argument are referring to equipment and not gameplay, I don’t think it’s relevant to that, despite it needing a fix. (I’m tired of my bots standing in fire trying to stop being on fire)
So it’s going to become a lazy cash grab, gotcha.
Numbers are probably wrong unless DF actually posts them. Not everyone that plays the game gives feedback. Considering in regards to a major large update that will literally change the entire game as we know it, the people who want historical accuracy are now in the majority in regards of people who give feedback should mean something.
And which part of historical accuracy is this ?
Is it the one that wishes to keep the game we have aka full squads with smg’s but with equipment that fits the timeline ?
Or is it the one that wants historical accuracy to that extend that those SMG’s are limited like actually historically correct ?
Well the AI response was mostly pointed out to ww2 atmosphere which I dont recall ever existed in this game.
Due to AI.
Probably ? If its what pays the bills.
Okay so do you happen to have some sort of numbers ? Like amount of forum users ? Or anything in that regard that could support your claim of majority ?
Literally read what Barendd1974 just cited you. It obviously implies some historical accuracy.
Ah yes, because as we all know keofox is definitely very trustworthy.
Nothing about that says anything about historical accuracy.
Like I said, it is implied. Love how you conveniently omitted ‘‘and is careful with details’’ btw.
The game hasn’t been historically accurate, ever.
False. The issue here is that you like to cherry pick mistakes the devs implemented either as a result of them not noticing it or peer pressure from you types and then use that as ‘‘evidence’’ that this game was never meant to be historically accurate.
You like many others who are so bothered by our valid criticisms are just conflating our want for some historical accuracy for this needing to be a full-on milsim or another HLL.
Just a heads up, this is someone who likes to pull strawmen out of nowhere, assume your race or where you live just because of your name, and is almost incoherent.
Game is dying because of crappy progression and poor balance (caused due to equipment being locked to campaigns.
Real life is not balanced, historical accuracy is not balanced)
Hell Let Loose is leaps and bounds ahead of Enlisted in terms of historical accuracy.
Shit time travels in that.