Happy 1 year anniversary of "placeholder" Soviet 17-pounder and Japanese Pak 40

To things that Actively Matter more.

11 Likes

“It’s been forwarded to the devs”
“It’s a known bug”
“It will be fixed in a future update”
IMG_0877

23 Likes

upvote and bookmark, because SERIOUSLY…

Something seems up with Jerome Baker | Page 6 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

5 Likes

Like the Berlin’s pea camo replaced by the Stalingrad’s camo, or like event apc for Jap and Russian, or like assault engee squads for jap qnd usa …

What else ?

1 Like

It would have been better to leave the PAK.

Fans of purely historical battles waiting to not be neglected since February 2023?

We’re preparing to celebrate the 3-year anniversary of this announcement in February 2026.

7 Likes

Doubt they have plans to change it in the first place. This is not their priority. Since in previous situation they took years to replace that place holder mg42 and Flakvierling 38.

2 Likes

dont forget the historical filter for custom games haha

3 Likes

We’ll remind devs about them

4 Likes

Would like to know the priorities though.

Is it possible to remind them about the bayonet for the FG42, the Assault Engineers for Japan and Allies or the broken FW models too?

2 Likes

It’s possible

Still planned and not forgotten, but as I said multiple times Japan needs an AR first

Not fixable unless fixed in WT

1 Like

Huh Didnt know they were broken in War Thunder as well.

3 Likes

As far as I am aware, they’re not.

2 Likes

They really don’t need one.

Inventing a weapon that never existed/was never used in WW2 just to add a specific squad/make it “just like the other boys” is negative IQ

1 Like

That’s how they have been developing this game for couple years now and i doubt there will be any change to that

Imo, Jap didn’t need to go in br 5 …it was a bad idea. Now if Dev wants to keep the Jap op against br5 US (and Russians?) , they need to “create” new protos :confused:

2 Likes

the worst thing is the stupid waste of ressources that went into modeling the weak AA guns that no one wanted INSTEAD of modeling the proper AT guns that EVERYONE wanted.
absolutely wrong and stupid decision.
and the weak AAs also ruined balance on every BR higher than 2.

its as if someone at gaijin tries to fuck up as much as possible.

Wich AA guns?

Well, no.

I absolutely support priority of low BR over high BR.

Not only because I barely play high BR with its metric tonne of fakes, but also because every single player will have had to go through low BR however not every player will want to stay at high BR.

All 4 factions having their proper AA guns instead of Flakvierling was a good idea.

1 Like