This is such a pathetic and dumb argument that I find it completely insulting.
Now that everyone only plays meta stuff anyway, since they have the opportunity to get into other BRs :))))
Whereas if there was a ±0 MM, things on every single BR would be way easier to balance. And thus easier to suppress the meta.
Not even mentioning devs should keep adding new stuff to all BRs for all factions.
Br system is pretty fucked. I tried to open the japanese tech tree and found br1 game is totally unplayable. imagine all starter squad with starter weapon and have to fight tier 3 or even tier4 since I see garand.
DF could just make everyone confortable by ±0 BR and make sure equal amount of players and fill the rest with ai. But instead they dont for whatever reason
Low BR JP is miserable since it’s filled with Americans at BR2 and BR3 it’s the only BRs where they can find some peace without always losing, while high BR is easy mode where you win almost all matches since people just stick what nation is now popular. There are zero reason to play as high BR Americans and Soviets unless you like losing 24/7. Who thought it was a good idea to add Ho-Ri (after months of suffering vs KT) without a SuperPershing? He needs to be fired.
Um, the Ho RI is really easy to just blow up with a rocket because of the open hatch it has…
yea i saw you blow up in the pacific by someone i forgot which one tho
Well, considering one is spamming a word over and over, what do you expect? Not the sharpest. I also don’t do meta builds or what floats that boat. But for some reason, this game needs to have eSports and big clan action or whatever the hell. Again, another reasonable suggestion by you!
These are some of my favourite weapons! Love them all - and the Brownings at BR3 and the MG34. Still use them all vs BR5 and do absolutely fine!
Equipment is not the issue.
Browning and MG34 are just outliners they are so strong that they could be as well BR4 or BR5 weapons
i mean i use farquhar on br5 and it pretty decent as long as you dont mind the disadvantage of it being SA (beside i used it on the british medal soldier)
No, the issue is those of your caliber. But I agree, equipment isn’t the problem.
Thank you for stating the obvious… Just more “insights” into the game yet again!
Not just those though - all you described. Mondragon, Farquhar, ZH29 - plus Sniper Garand, Panther - this is just off the top of my head that I play in BR5 that isn’t BR5 rated - multiple planes too.
They are all perfectly competitive - the equipment balance isn’t the problem. In fact - it’s probably the best it’s ever been. Remember when we didn’t have BR and it was bolt action vs AVS etc. Even then you could usually compete - it depends on your team and your opponents skill (and whether they’re in a stack) - and obviously number of deserters/bot teams
In terms of results
The environment won’t be much different
You will still see level 3 or lower equipment and vehicles at level 5
Because someone will always do it
There are still a group of guys whose equipment can’t keep up with the level and who have no ability, lowering their winning rate.
Will there be people crying and demanding mandatory equipment levels next?
The proportion of tactical awareness and desire to win among players is the key to winning or losing.
Blind faith is good
Maybe it makes you feel superior about yourself
But cannot change the environment
The only country I think has equipment disadvantages is Japan.
They have the worst overall performance vehicles
They have fewer choices than any other country
So we can only use those fictional and blueprint weapons as our main force.
When most players’ technology trees are full, they will return to the most disadvantaged camp.
Don’t tell me how powerful their fighter jets are.
The United States only needs to ensure that it can send rockets to the combat zone.
The rest can be left to the infantry
As long as they are not monkeys
You can make it look like stating the obvious by quoting without the context. But it doesn’t seem to be that obvious when everyone is just crying BR.
The reason we don’t have more BR Match-Groups is playerbase size to support them. While I agree that a 3rd match-group is indeed needed for balance and would be beneficial to both the game’s quality as well as playerbase retention, I believe stronger NPE is more important.
Also, please note that generally speaking, Historical Accuracy = Unbalanced Gameplay. There HAS to be a level of historical inaccuracy if you want game balance. This is why I prefer the game to be more historical on characteristics of the firearms and vehicles then the atmosphere they are in.
Pfff to low Playerbase, i give a F.
If i play vs Players OK
If i play vs AI OK
BR3 or BR5 should get their own Matches…
2vs1 4vs3 and 5vs5 or 1vs2 3vs3 and 4vs5
All Guns and Vehicles need a Rework for their BR
Semis should be at BR2 atleast and no compromisse about MAG SIZE BIGGER > HIGHER BR
thats bullshit
What ever happened to ±1? Why do you guys keep on fantasising about ±1BR exluded rules even though that’s what causes the problem to begin with?
Why shouldn’t BR3 face BR4? With what logic?
We are complaining that KV1s are unbeatable to BR1 players, while at the same time they are worthless in BR5 matches.
±1
It’s all so simple, but you guys keep on suggesting stuff that makes no sense.
how is that bullshit exactly? i would agree if this was BA where 5 or 10 rounds doesnt mean anything, but with semi or smg mag size matters. unless you think that type hei/otsu should be on same BR as breda PG carcano.
Theres plenty of equipment to down tier in BR scale to make BR3-4 more competent against BR5.
Obviously the lower tier is always in disadvantage.
But im more willing to throw BR3 under the bus against higher tiers than make BR1-2 fight even BR3.
I play BR4 AND BR5 mostly. I understand that the devs should balance better gameplay and HA.