Yeah, the 4 was still too reliable for Russian standards.
2 Likes
of course it’s biased. just becuz gamerboi doesn’t like it. but majority of you still appeal to coolstories literally born of memoires, films and other unreliable crap and you still have impudence to talk about bias
2 Likes
AHAHAHAHAHAHAH, OMG, bro. You made my day. Let’s use more conspiracy theories)
2 Likes
so they kindly downgraded it 1488 times by building crap like Ferdinand with only about 120 degrees of view or KT which didn’t have any mobility while being built of pressed beton
2 Likes
What can you do, history ordered otherwise 
2 Likes
what a trick from history defenders. just say “naaah i wasa tralling!” and everything is forgiven for you
1 Like
4 Likes
Hard words from someone who claimed that letting AI paint is same level as human-made art huh
2 Likes
The same can be said about the American data. What is the point of giving such a characteristic as a rate of fire at all? If we proceed from a sloppy distortion and lies, then maybe the weapon didn’t fire at all and the whole war with bayonets went through?
In most cases, the difference in scrorosterility is greater due to the characteristics of a particular sample.
It would be nice to find out in practice, but it cannot be measured. All available samples are museum pieces. There are no shooting videos on YouTube.
With that logic make Fedorov 1000 rpm
1 Like
yes why not?
PPSH GO BRRR 
haha
Begs the question then…if the other guns had to be so close to be useful, and the t34 didnt…
Why did it have a 6 to 1 death to kill ratio with 75% of all loses in 1942 to calibres under 50mm
And this is from russian battlefield reports.
Clearly…Something really wrong there
4 Likes
You guys genuinely think that pre-WW1 weapon is superior to the MKB?
Do you really think that a prototype is better than a mass-produced weapon?
meanwhile AKM/M2 Browning/MG42(3-5-100500) be like: ok
It’s a game. In principle, we do not take into account a huge number of nuances. Speed is not superiority. This even had consequences in the form of overheating of the barrel. The power of the rifle cartridge and such rate of fire very quickly rendered the weapon unusable. Therefore, it was almost always used in semi-automatic mode.
How are things going with the Browning heavy machine guns that are still in service? Hasn’t something better been invented in 100 years?
These are all paper characteristics that do not reflect reliability and operating experience. In general, the Fedorov Avtomat is classified more as an automatic rifle than an assault rifle. But the USSR needs to be given an analogue in the game and the choice here is small: either Experimental assault rifles of 44-45 years, or the Fedorov Automatic Machine, drawn according to certain characteristics, which was at least used in the war.
1 Like
it’s interesting more about how, when, where, with how much hits. especially if vehicle was damaged before, becuz as i said, cooperation in first part of war was quite bad (guess at which side). here you might see that in 42nd year majority of 37-50mm hits were counted as “undangerous” and even pak40 had nice chance to just deal ricochet at that pyramid hull. most losses are count as “engine hit” which means just straight what you might think-shitty visibility and ambushing or live bait tactics with cooperation of PaK38 and Pz2/3s. the same way Soviets actually ripped many KTs and Panthers, especially those in Poland. and excuse me, war is not won with number of frags or something. if you finally have enemy in your capital, you wouldn’t say like “hey but i got maximum exp”. war of attrition requires quantity over quality (but i still won’t listen to all those coolstories that Soviets didn’t fix quality to the 43th year, while Reich had it’s factories bombed and experienced soldiers or workers slowly replaced with “Hitlervolkjugend”), while losing 1 wonderwaffe is way worse than losing 6 cheap and reliable machines, which could also be repaired soon. one more thing- the picture of battle is not the narrow corridor like in Wilhelm Strasse where 1 Tiger faces 6 T-34s. Tiger might hold one narrow point while others, held by Pz3/4s, could be smashed by artillery or same hordes of T-34s and battle would be lost anyway. in the end, 1 tank loss doesn’t mean crew will die.
so at the end, number of kills shows literally nothing in real war, especially out of context
2 Likes
But its well known truth. Like well known right now, soviet with their propaganda “best tank of the war/buy it from us its good tank” did good job in overrating it.
1 Like
Uh, a prototype, you say? Stop acting dumb, for God’s sake. I know that you know that the Fedorov has more damage than even the MP43 and StG 44. They have the same rate of fire, but the Fedorov has slightly worse vertical recoil. However, as I already mentioned earlier, with the -40 recoil perk, it offsets this downside
Fedorov with a damage value of 12.6 is approximately 30% superior to the STG with a damage value of 9.6.
2 Likes