I actually like this announcement. I look forward to these changes.
4 Likes
Not aggressively, recklessly. At the moment there is no incentive to keep yourself alive, just kill, kill, be killed. There needs to be some balance to the scoring, this is intending to increase the discrepancy and make rushing in and dying even more of an attractive play style than it already is.
2 Likes
it wouldve been nice if you could consider making the game more accommodating to tanks, like letting us allocate which and how many are needed to be brought on the battlefield, for example sa short barrel panzer 3 j, instead of bringing APCR which is mostly none effective against medium tanks, it wouldve been more ideal to allocate those points to bring more either HE or HEAT
Maybe it would be better if you made an update so that the soldiers would be even smarter and the maps would expand even more.
1 Like
Does this mean the kind of chests we get for gambling, which cost 5000 silver each?
If the proposed changes make people more aggressive and actually play the points, then that’s a good thing. There are too many players that aren’t aggressive enough, and snipe from across the map instead of fighting for the objectives.
It’s a fast-paced game. We’re playing in squads with AI. Dying a lot is always going to be a thing. And if I’m going to die a lot, then I want better payouts for my efforts when trying to win a match.
People shouldn’t be rewarded for hiding in a house all the match just so they don’t get penalised for dying.
12 Likes
You should be worried about whether you’ll only get 500 silver or a 50% boost card from that big login reward.
I think we should demand that the crate’s upper limit for daily login rewards be raised to at least 30,000.
You’re right! At least when we play the game now, we can keep some basic logic,
so we don’t have to throw our lives away senselessly like mindless fodder.
Historically, when the Soviets attacked German positions, they often had to pay a price
of five times the manpower—it looks absolutely crazy at first glance.
To win this game, you have to push forward and build spawn points for your team.
I think we should even ask for shorter base build times for spawn points.
When your spawn gets destroyed, you’re stuck in a tough spot:
either run all the way back immediately, or build a new one first before supporting.
If you don’t have the build speed skill, you’re just stuck between a rock and a hard place.
2 Likes
Yeah, the US already has M26 Pershing, Super Pershing, and T99.
The USSR at BR5 only has the IS-2, with a 21-second reload—it’s no match for the Tiger II at all.
When will they add a new Soviet tank at BR5 that can actually fight the Tiger II head-on?
Something like the IS-100 (Object 248), T-44-100, or early IS-3 would be great—at least they could stand a chance
1 Like
It’s been a while since the last major update. Can you please revisit the issue regarding body armor in the game? It is unbalanced that one faction is able to have different HP values from everybody else without any downsides to it.
Polls taken from the subreddit indicate a large majority of players are NOT SATISIFED WITH THE CURRENT IMPLEMENTATION of body armor
Naturally you should keep in mind every meta gaming USSR player is going to stomp over here and argue some nonsense as to why their faction should have 10% more HP than everybody else because they sank so many cosmetic orders into meta gaming.
Please consider the needs of the majority and not the extremely loud minority
19 Likes
If we could actually get 5000, that would be great—at least we’d get random crates with a base value of 20,000.
But from what they’ve said so far, that’s not going to happen.
I’m really worried they’ll just give us a rigged slot machine with adjusted odds, making daily login rewards completely meaningless.
It would even be worse than before, when we got gold cards, 30,000 silver, or three 300% XP boosters.
They’ll probably just hand out 500 silver, a 50% XP boost, or 5 costume coupons as a lazy excuse.
We should really hold DF accountable for nerfing login rewards so hard and acting like it’s totally fine.
Gold cards are irreplaceable.
3 Likes
Totally agree. The game needs to go away from the stupid rush fast paced idot gameplay. Spray n pray Fortninte style doesn’t fit this game where we have combioned arms, engineers with buildings. It needs to be a better pace to make full use of all the games mechanics.
Idiot rush to cap n die is trash gameplay and completely wrong for this game
6 Likes
I briefly read through to make sure no one else discussed this, so sorry if someone has and I missed it:
@MajorMcDonalds does “the bonus for eliminating enemies while attacking and defending points will be doubled” apply for simply eliminating an enemy on an objective, or does the player doing the eliminating have to be infantry and on the objective as well, to receive the bonus?
If this bonus applies for vehicle HE spam as well, this will be a concern.
6 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Italy update and finally make UK and Italy standalone factions as should be. one can only hope…
4 Likes
In the never-used-in-ww2 trash folder
9 Likes
Why don’t you put out announcements for three BP passes in one quarter, just like you used to?
Or just as fully functional sub-factions, rather than current token representation…
Either works for me, what doesn’t work is what we have now.
1 Like
yes
3 Likes
Hey, this is a World War II game, not a Cold War game. If you’re planning to include the T-44 and IS-3, the German Panther II, Maus, and Tiger II with a 105mm gun should appear. Otherwise, this is a serious mistake that disrupts game balance and WWII history.
1 Like