what you say what you’re saying is right, but all of that doesn’t fit in enlisted.
now the grey zone is about 100m/120m to the objective if they remove it basically the tanks for being usefull needs to stay on the point, its not grey zone problem is a map problem
Luckily the maps of HnG are not known for massive camping…
Oh wait.
Well trade a problem with another, i don’t find camping wrong if you can actually go and destroy the enemy (imo).
Yes, but to be exact, the Tunisian campaign was in 1943 so it would be fine at the end , in 1941 and 42 due from Tripoli (Libya) Cyrenaica and Egypt to Alemein (Egypt 1943) and after the German withdrawal begins the tunisian campaign
the only tiger that should be present in this game, is in berlin.
where t34 85s can pen it frontally.
whether the other campaigns, no tigers should be present.
but that’s just my opinion.
EDIT:
problem is, yeah, in tunisia those tanks were presents. but with the current line up, it’s just overkill for majority of the tanks that are present.
( let alone the counter part not having much to deal against it. )
What I think will be the best in this game is the day that tank players and infantry players learn to collaborate with each other … the most dangerous thing, no tank is a platoon between a player with an infantry who knows how to use it and one of tanks that knows how to use it … that’s almost invincible
Kurt Knispel who was a rebellious tanker and almost hated by his army drove his Tiger I in the Russian campaign to Kursk from there they moved it west and his company was equipped with Tiger II fought from to Caen near Normandy where it was great , until Paris later in the ardennes also with his Tiger II and later to the east again to fight against the Soviets. On one occasion the Knispel tank was hit, according to the report, 24 times by enemy fire. and that was a tiger ii
well,
in those campaigns would make sense.
i was thinking, also in stalingrad or usually campaigns where the opposite faction can take it out frontally, is good for sake of balance.
I believe that Estalingrado by itself gives to make a campaign of its own
Game definitelly need Tiger and other new things. I maxed out Normandy and stopped playing it out of boredom but Mp43 and Panther was introducd and also new stuff on Allied side and it’s interesting to play it again. New things are needed to keep this game alive. Only question is where to put them. Current Normandy campaign is probably not suited for Tiger and is already getting oversaturated with other stuff so I expect it to be put maybe in Berlin or even I hope to see new Western front 1944 or 1945 campaign, prefferably at the time Tiger’s were already historically present in the battles.
Yes so, they must do new things, more maps, campaign extensions and even link campaigns or allow whoever finishes a campaign after transferring a squad to another campaign as a reward.
volume_up
129 / 5000
YES. THAT’S HOW IT IS. They must introduce new things to make the game interesting and something else so that the fun does not end at the end
Yeah we really need more broken stuff.
The fun we already have isnt enough.
I really don’t see what the big deal is. We know they already have the models. If they can balance the Invasion attack points by changing the reinforcement count refund for harder points, couldn’t they just as easily balance tanks by giving the Germans a longer spawn counter for them? That would also accurately reflect the historical balance (which the allies one) between quantity and quality.
I just had a match where I happily moved up to the side slightly behind friendly infantry in my Pz IV J. Everyone was occupied with the infantry so nobody really tried to destroy me while I had cover from friendlies and I was nowhere near the gray zone I’m pretty sure. Then at the last capture point we moved into a town, and 1 guy managed to sneak past my friendlies who were busy attacking the point (which is fine of course). The only reason he destroyed me in the end was because in the last few seconds of the match I decided to meme around and run him over lol. And I’m pretty sure even if we wouldn’t have lost without me providing infantry support with my tank, it would’ve taken us a few minutes longer for sure.
So my problems with gray zone camping stay the same:
Unless it’s a very open map, it doesn’t provide too much benefit to the team (same as campers who refuse to play the objective).
It makes tank gameplay stale and uninteresting.
It doesn’t hurt the enemy team as much as it annoys them. I’ve had many matches where because of this I decided to just sit on point and not to anything because it was pointless. I didn’t get much for those matches, I didn’t have fun in those matches, we just had a really frustrating but easy win where nobody had fun but that 1 camping tank got tons of xp alone. This could lead to us getting the Gaijin treatment where we get a blanket xp gains nerf because of these people (though I do trust DF a lot more than Gaijin, even though they aren’t perfect either).
[quote=“116047982, post:113, topic:28884, full:true”]
A Squad of Tiger I was in Normandy, and they arrived before the panthers that arrived on June 30, because another landing was expected further south and they waited … but that’s another story. The battalion was 3 tiger and it was on June 13 in Normandy commanded by Ace Michael Wittman, he left behind his first two tiger, to advance alone and cut the way to the shermans and in that action he destroyed 23 tanks and about 20 vehicles until they run out of ammunition and have to retire … so if we honor the history and courage of the Americans, who fought against this tank giant, the Tigers appear in Normandy before the Panthers, of the also famous As Ernst Barkman and the famous battle of Barkman’s corner
at this point they could easily make a premium ace tiger and stop, the panther is basically a tiger but better so i dont think it will fit in normandy.
I recognize that in terms of mobility and inclination of the glacis the Pantera is a magnificent tank although I do not agree that it is better than a tiger I. In good hands and always offering a good angle against the enemy, a tiger becomes very resistant, thanks to Its robust front and side armor, between 30 and 40 degrees against the firing adversary, the glacis and turret front plates made it very resistant to a tiger, and its interior space made possible a quick reload of the cannon and a quick change of positions in its crew … as well as a good rate of turn and backward march, that is why so many tigers did a good job in the war, the panter with its slow retreat, is a relatively easy tank to flank and not so the tiger, and once flanked both are easy prey
irl maybe yes, in game the panther is simply better.
I think that a game like this in which one enjoys the way you did is good and especially because a tank must support the progress of its infantry and cover it … and risk there is nothing wrong with losing the tank … The important thing is to play a good role and help to victory. I usually do a lot of assists and they are not valued as they should but in the end it does not matter as long as there is GOOD FUN. …