I also got shot down by a kar98k sniper once. Doesn’t mean it’s an effective weapon agaist aircraft.
In 3 cases, I inflicted damage to them that led to their fall
How do you know? It doesn’t say what damage you did. And it’s possible the IL-2 pilot either wanted to respawn and decided to give you the kill or simply ran out of energy and fell, possibly even overestimated his plane by trying an impossible manuever and crashed.
in 4 cases I killed the pilot (since I had already learned to play on an plane a little).
What 4 cases? You don’t show 4 of these, and if you mean in total, then that’s very low.
I always meant Henschel by He.I don’t care how it’s shortened there.
Well you should. Saying he-123 is like reffering to a Pe-3 as an Il-3. It just makes you (no offense) sound like an idiot.
I’ve already forgotten about Henkel
It’s Heinkel, and it was a very important company. Much more than Henschel.
You just hit a suicide bomber.
It’s like destroying an empty tank with a knife.
No, I got shot down. Pilot sniped.
They were smoking.
Planes in enlisted always smoke. And even in warthunder (the game all these vehicles are ported over from), where that’s not the case, smoke means water/oil/fuel leak, and that’s not always deadly. It may be basically harmless or slowly destroy your engine over a few minutes time.
The plane becomes uncontrollable not only with the loss of the pilot \ wings.
Yes, destroyed control wires or cut off tail will also do that. But there’s no way to tell within enlisted, except for watching the behaviour of the plane. It’d be kinda similar as to how a plane acts when the pilot jumps out.
Number of case.
In total? That’s very low.
All Soviet aircraft are named after the first two letters of the engineer surname.
Not all. And with germany the case is the same (except it can also be the company, as unlike the USSR, those existed there). Henschel just has an exception, as to not confuse them with Heinkel, a completely different company. And that’s just the way it is. Shortening henschel to he is confusing, ignorant and stupid.
Yea many big bombers was build at his factorys(how i remembered).
As well as the first functional prototype jet aircraft.
Its luck.But i for ONE battle shot down ALL enemy IL-2 for ONE life.
Thats what was.
In 4 case it was,not in total.It was last case in this battle,where i was fly behind IL-2.In case number 5 he fly behind me and after my maneuvres lose control and fall to land.
In USSR they was,but owner was state\all people of USSR.Like the Kalashnikov concern.
Its luck.But i for ONE battle shot down ALL enemy IL-2 for ONE life.
Well, depends on what you consider shot down. If you consider it to be when you get the kill or actually destroy them midair (pilot, fire, etc).
And within none of the cases you shown were the wires cut. That would look like the plane simply lost any control. It’ll either fly straight, or just endlessly keep repeating the same motion over and over (like turning in a circle), as it’s control surfaces will be unusable, so that means it won’t be able to change direction or anything.
In 4 case it was,not in total.It was last case in this battle,where i was fly behind IL-2.In case number 5 he fly behind me and after my maneuvres lose control and fall to land.
Sorry, can’t understand that well enough to be sure I’m not misunderstanding something.
In USSR they was,but owner was state\all people of USSR.Like the Kalashnikov concern.
They were state owned workshops and factories. Much different from actual companies, as those would go against soviet communism.
I was get exp for them.
They didn’t attack ground targets,because of me.
They didn’t hit me.
They fell.
I think that’s enough to say that I shot them down.
It’s better than writing without understanding the meaning.
Not much.
In general, it does not differ in any way.
It’s just that these companies have no income, and they produce for the state, not profit.And they receive subsidies from the state if it is satisfied with their work.
So different only in economic side.
Not much.
In general, it does not differ in any way.
It’s just that these companies have no income, and they produce for the state, not profit.And they receive subsidies from the state if it is satisfied with their work.
So different only in economic side.
It very much does. In the way it’s run is completely different. And companies do not need permission from the government to be created/function, nor are they directly managed by it. Unlike their soviet counterparts.
If you mean those, then some of them are shown to get a ground target run in and others don’t show enough context. No clue if that’s the first run or a rearm run.
It doesn’t change the essence.
Still doesn’t mean it’s the same thing.
The various factories did not get worse from the fact that they were state-owned, not private.
That is debatable. And seeing as it’s far from the original topic, I’m not planning to get into that here.
make video,when see in sky enemy IL-2.So they not make more 1 attack on the land.
Don’t understand what you’re trying to say there.
Its mean the same thing.
No, it doesn’t. The only thing that’s identical between the 2 are what they do. How they work is completely different. Kinda like how both a solar pannel and a wind turbine create elctricity. The product is the same, but that doesn’t mean the sources are.
That not is debatable.
It very much is. I could write a whole essay about the benefits and disadvantages of having the state run the industrial sector, and find plenty of evidence to back them up, but seeing as I don’t want to waste any extra time here, and
Very good idea.
Seeing as you probably agree that this would bring nothing to the original topic and would waste both of our time, I will refrain myself from doing so.
They differ only in priorities and resources.
A private company is not supported by the state (for the most part) and works for its own money, and their goal is profit.
A state-owned company exists on public money and works for the benefit of the state.
And just like that, you’ve lost me. I don’t have the time, and since you’re made it clear you’re not considerate of other people’s time, you certainly aren’t worth my time either.
I start video when see in sky enemy il-2.
Just because you didn’t see it hit ground targets doesn’t mean it didn’t.
They didn’t attack ground targets,because of me.
Meaning this sentence is a complete lie.
I do not want to waste any more time here. I am muting this topic and you will not hear any more from me. And go learn some English so people can actually understand what you’re saying next time.
