ttk is 0 for both ( No body armor )
at 40m the ttk starts to increase for fg42 40 - 60m its 0.08
Same happens for avt except its 60 - 80m
Unfortunately no, but with superior soviet skills you can buy body armor and then the differency is 15 kills with 1 mag AVT.
And 10 kills with 1 mag fg42.
Oh no, well. The good thing is
this is updated, so theres all the numbers required for math to prove your points.
but there is damage indicated at a distance of 10 meters and 100 meters. there are no intermediate values. Just food for thought.
which means it’s all a lie.
yes yes, I saw this skill. there was news recently about how such “sikll” players were banned permanently. I don’t know a living person who is capable of making 15 kills from an AVT40 in fully automatic shooting mode with one magazine. Do you know? Show me?
In both cases avt actually has higher dmg, 10m or 100m.
But I assume you are now doing some mental gymnastics here and pretending AVT is say 15 at 10m and only 4 between 11m and 99m ?
I mean you are free to provide stats that suits your argument.
Yea, stats datamined by eurythmia? Some sort of mod.
Or you, im sure your but but i think this is lie argument is better.
Im pretty sure there are relatively few that could do the same with 20 round fg42 either.
So not exactly sure whats your mental gymnasium point here ?
For this exact reason in this exact case, its quite alot easier to compare the gun stats that doesnt change anywhere, regardless whos using it.
I could make a “prove” video of hitting every shot with avt and not hitting a single shot with fg42
Aka human error or in this exact case just exaggerated bias.
And then you respond with squad wiping with fg42 and shooting at the sky with avt.
So you probably get the point here ?
I didn’t play Germany either , so what is your point ? Answer me this, do you actually think soviets need to be buffed ? Say why if yes
no. statistics from here
https://enlisted.vercel.app/comparison
That’s what I have to ask you.
why on earth is the AVT40 with a 15-round magazine and a rate of fire of 600 equal in effectiveness to the FG42-2 with a 20-round magazine and a rate of fire of 750? Why? This is where the real mental gymnastics is. How many more excuses are you ready to come up with?
I can answer in your topic on the RU forum. If you want. If it is not convenient for you to read. Then I will duplicate it here.
I see talk about body armor, and my personal thought is that DF should either slow the solders significantly who are wearing them because it was heavy, or shit can them all together. My vote would be just to shit can it. The US had body armor but did not wear it because of the weight other then flak jackets.
those do actually show all the ranges.
these are exact 10 and 100m you moaned about.
And these stats are up to date.
You are also for once free to bring stats or what ever at this point to back up any of your claims.
roughly 10rounds / second. So technically 10 kills enough to squad wipe
About 12,5 rounds a second in same conditions, so technically without bodyarmor we’re looking at 12,5kills.
And if the sign of insane skills, the body armor is present the number is 6,25kills.
Under all conditions its still capable to kill 15 with 1 mag.
While for FG42 it varies between 20 and 10, depending how much of skill is soviets using.