State your argument for why its OP or you are admitting you are just trolling
also you used this word in the wrong context? it is you whom has been logically fallacy
in the opening bud
That does not say why they are OP. You simply have given them a flawed comparison to bombers (which are much stronger then you indicate).
Again, why is it OP for all infantry to have them?
im stating that off the 68 that have seen this thread only 3 have complained, thus out of 68 only 3 have issue to actually try and argue this point meaning more people are indifference or are in minor agreement on top the 2 likes
also once more im asking you to state why you disagree with the opening, and since you have not proveded any fact or counter arguments, i can only assume that you have none
also seeing as i did not mention any mention of you in the statement “also telling me that im wrong with out telling why is rather cowardly and ignorant” it is not an personnel attack, stop trying to justify your false narrative, and since you were the 1st to actively point to me and state that i am “feeling intellectually inferior” you are the 1st to attack me
the whole point of why they are “op” your words not mine is in the opening
in that statement implying that all classes have access to it and that it dose a better job then AT weapons
Only 3 respond to your post because you have not provided a very articulate reason anywhere and are just trolling.
One cannot counter opinions with facts friend, asking me to do so is another logical fallacy.
Your opener did not state why Expacks are OP. It mistakenly stated they were inferior to bombers. 250kg bombs exist check em out.
AT weapons can be upgraded and used from a distance. “better job” is relative. Your just bad with the other AT weapons and get killed a lot with expacks. You have stated yourself you have limited experience with tanks and therefore no idea how this would change the balance of the game.
Confirmed troll
maybe its becuase only three have issues with it, and it seems that you did not read it very well
well yes you can counter opinions with fact, “my opinion is that i should not have to pay for things"vs"it take money to make things thus meaning economie” opinion-vs-fact
Your opener did not state why Expacks are OP. It mistakenly stated they were inferior to bombers. 250kg bombs exist check em out.
once more
and no mention of the bomber planes have been made
and once more its my opinion and opening that the AT weapons should do a better job then what they curranty do
thus i have posted both buffs and nerfs as ideas, no where in the opening post is it a demand nor it states that if the devs do one they have to do all
and that is the 2nd time you have called me a troll even though your argument has been disproven two times and you have also attacked me as a person, it is you who is the troll here my good sir
calling someone a troll for the reason that you cant state any valid points is what trolls do
state some counter points then we can have a intellectual conversations of compromise, approval and disapproval
1 Like
im having more fun replying to you then i have in game 
Ok then - address why your the majority despite asserting otherwise. It is the only reason you have given as to how one ‘opinion’ can be ‘right’ over another.
You have given no explanation as to why they are “only reliable anti-tank weapon”.
Mines have the same effectiveness.
Anti tank rifles are use-able at range and are effective at their role when used correctly
Antitank guns are also use-able at range and are extremely effective when used correctly
Bombers fly at speed above the battlefield immune to almost all ground forces and can obliterate everything easily If used correctly
Flamethrowers/molotovs have similar range and lower damage but effect vision
Expacks are short range, difficult to use and dangerous to the user.
So according to your own rules - disprove these points with facts.
currently 5 people are in agreement that the det pack need a change 5 to 3
once more going around in circles you have taken the whole statement out of context
ok cool what have they got to do with the price of fish
only aginst early tier tanks
currently only effective at about 50 meters and needs good skill and at best will destroy a tank, were as a det pack is good at 20+meters with a good guarantee that it will either disable or destroy,
not apart of this topic
also not apart of this topic
still dose not change that they are so readily available thus making them a problem, also “difficult to use” HA lol no the det pack is one of the low skill weapons in the game
1 Like
“currently 5 people are in agreement that the det pack need a change 5 to 3”
currently only 68 people out of the entire pop are complaining - 68 vs millions your the minority
“once more going around in circles you have taken the whole statement out of context”
I countered a direct quote from you, contextualise your own quote if you like, but i think you know you have lost this one.
“ok cool what have they got to do with the price of fish”
You said “only reliable anti-tank weapon” numerous FACTS which indicate your wrong.
“only aginst early tier tanks”
You need to be shooting for weak spots, its a rifle not artillery.
“currently only effective at about 50 meters and needs good skill and at best will destroy a tank, were as a det pack is good at 20+meters with a good guarantee that it will either disable or destroy,”
Incorrect the penetration loss at 50m+ isnt that high. You need to be shooting for weak spots, its not a OHK solution. Guarantee? LOL. The expac must be touching the tank when it detonates else it does little damage to all but the early tanks, it also must be cooked to detonate on impact as a smart tanker will drive away from the explosive indicator given to them.
“not apart of this topic”
As a anti-tank weapon they both are part of this topic. “only reliable anti-tank weapon” Your words. Balance isnt about you smashing everything in your way champ.
“still dose not change that they are so readily available thus making them a problem, also “difficult to use” HA lol no the det pack is one of the low skill weapons in the game”
The expac must be touching the tank when it detonates else it does little damage to all but the early tanks, it also must be cooked to detonate on impact as a smart tanker will drive away from the explosive indicator given to them. You also have to get within 20m of a tank, which is close to inside the infantry mortality radius for the expack.
What level campaign are you? What level are your tankers? Think this may reveal the secret to why you hate expacks
still irrelevant due to the face that so few people are complaining
“once more going around in circles you have taken the whole statement out of context”
I countered a direct quote from you, contextualise your own quote if you like, but i think you know you have lost this one.
TWO STATEMENTS FOR THIS ONE REEEE
still trying to nullify this one are you? 
mines are very easily destroyed by planes and rogue nades
taken out of context once more
was the full statement and once more we are not really talk about AT rifles since there are not across all the campaign so thus rather redundant to the topic
the whole topic is about balance more or less making the det pack less usefull and other things more useful, thus balance, and once more less skill is needed to destroy a tank with a det pack then just about every other AT weapon
still easy to use and so readily available and also perks allow you to peg it up to 30 meters away and most people dont really care for saving thier AI mates
level 16,17 moscow and level 19.23normandy and all tank starter squads are leveled up to max
Lol When you said ‘having more fun here then in game’
Guess you must REALLY suck in game. Also you should know squads dont stop leveling, “leveled to the max” LOL
Fighting your trolling with trolling. Without actually providing any arguments the game is much more fun then you. Ciao
OHH SO NO COUNTER? you out of steam?
squads cant level up any more once you reach the max amount of skill points
THREE DOWN
No they keep leveling, you just get no more points to spend. Get good.
i disagree
giving up and resulting to insults is not a very cash money thing
