M2 carbine 30/60 Three Magazines
M1 carbine 15/60 Five Magazines
AVS-36 15/I don’t know
ZH-29 10/ I don’t know
level 3 at Moscow
FG42 20/80 Five Magazines
if All Self-Loading Rifles for 30 or Two Magazines than
M2 Carbine can make sense
M1 Carbine can be a pass total 75 rounds
and FG42 is a Bug because of 20/80 than
All it could say is.
“All Self-Loading Rifle is under a 100 rounds”
but
M1 Garard is 30rounds
Gewehr series is 30rounds
than
M2 is 30/30 or 30/0
M1 is 15/15
FG42 is 20/20 because of nerf?
than i’ll say
“All selective-fire Weapons are Under a 100rounds”
???
FG42 12.0 if Upgraded 14.4
M1 Carbine is 8.0 Hit Power if Upgraded 8.8
M1 With Grenade Launcher is 7.3 Hit Power if Upgraded 8.0
M2 Carbine is 7.3 Hit Power if Upgraded 8.0
the point of the FG42 is to make Infantry for the Germans not one-sided
if the Allies have Better Vehicles Than the Germans
Than what does Germans have to Counteract against
Real FG42(s) in the WW2 was Too Expensive to make for most in service.
only 2,000 were made
The M2 Carbine in Game is trying to identify What and How this Weapon Work in Combat.
like all the Weapons
less than 200,000 were made.
So What’s Replaceable For The FG42?
Check the
"About the Weakening of FG42 and the Related Balance
I am not talking about replacements. I am purely talking balance. The reason M1/M2 have more ammo is because of the less dmg they do. 2 shots for a down, FG has 1 shot for a down. Logic dictates that M1/M2 should have double the ammo in that case. Let alone that the FG is far superior on all other fronts as well compared to the M2.
All other battle rifles are in line with the FG42 regarding ammo capacity. FG still has more than the rest(which is fine to me).