It was never going to be that - but it could have been “HLL lite” I reckon
if lite is 25% or less ok
Less strict reality in favour of looser gameplay - dunno how you would quantify those other than “more” and “less” - but I reckon there’s a gap in the market.
Also squad handling like Combat Mission or (I forget the name) - wher eyou can give squads actual tactical orders and they AI is sensuible enough to knoow that a line behind a hedge is a line bewhind a hedge and not a sertias of trampolines!
I asked for this but not this early. Honestly with current implementation they are weaker than propeller planes vs tanks/apcs. Which is fine they are only good vs other planes.
less as in i dont need to run to the objective but i dont want to hll walk or crawl as its called in enlisted
Well, we are at year five if we include CBT, more with CAT. So when would be the perfect time?
I felt like we should have priority on new maps first not the jets, we don’t even have spawnable SPAA at mid or high BR. We are missing multiple frontlines and they just put jets on maps that are from 1942-43 (and Normandy of 44). Which is fine for Me262 but not for the Su-9 that just flies around Stalingrad like it was made in one of those factories along of first T-34, or F-80 that was not fully operational till 1945 so couldn’t fight at Normandy.
1 Like
I have this feeling as well, I already barely play it, will probably only finish the current Japanese RMN thing and go in my own way because Im tired of playing with same stuff on same maps over and over again without any fun in doing it. But well I guess that making another Tarkov/Stalker esque game in already over saturated market of Eastern European survival games is essential. Whats next? A hero shooter? They cant even animate a trigger press anim and its 2025. The animations look stiff AF and the technology for motion capture was avaiable for years already. Not to mention the AI that even 20-30 year old games would laugh at
2 Likes