Honestly people who bitch about others making valid complaints that a ww2 game advertised to us about being historically accurate get on my nervs and it’s testing my restraint to not flame them to the brink of suicide.
Hell Let Loose is not a milsim, I don’t know where you got that idea. Also, neither Red Orchestra nor Rising Storm are milsims. You know what is a milsim? ARMA. No one is asking for this game to be exactly like ARMA multiplayer is. The only thing I think would be good to pull from ARMA would be their stance system.
The guy has no idea what milsim is.
Having authentic setting has no real correlation with being milsim or hardcore.
Cod 2 iss arcader than enlisted yet the authenticity is top noch
You donts see tigers rolling in libyan deserts in british campaig or dont see any stg 44 in stalingrad episodes.
Or you cant pick up panzerfaust from german deads in 1942-43 parts since it hasnt been created yet.
But it was a arcade triple a shooter for its time.
I mean, between arcade shooters, hardcore/tactical shooters, and milsims, the setting and the accuracy/authenticity of it has nothing to do with the classification among the three. The only thing that affects it being one of the three is the gameplay.
I think moscow and stalingrad can easily be merged into early eastern front (41-42).
so enlisted has players ???
no shit … from topics of last weeks before this announcement all i could read was that there is lack of players and GIVE US MATCHMAKING threads… so what the fuck is majority see as wrong with this update ? everything has pros and cons and people already are trying to find solution for hist. accuracy
besides, i dont care about people who play COD or BF5 cause those are shit games i will never touch, i would ditch enlisted overtime as well (just as my friends did) if this update wouldnt going to happen
what is that so called half of the playerbase like to do in battles ? hmmmm let me guess, gray zone camping with sniper squads, mindless suicide bombing and full auto and grenade spam against unmatched enemy full of noobs or bots that cannot use tanks or planes … no thx
and other peoples argument that not all battles were even in the past is crap… this is videogame and it has to be matched otherwise it looks like current enlisted
No it’s not.
Cod2 was far from accurate.
You can play on tunisia or map Stalingrad train map on multiplayer vanilla with the stg and the tanks destroyed around were pz4s gs and tigers.
No it wasn’t. But. People didn’t mind.
I only play Stalingrad and Moscow. Why the hell are they going to force me to play other fronts?? Tiger 2s and IS-2s in Moscow, STG44s in Moscow and Stalingrad, Fedorovs in Stalingrad, LADs in Moscow, FG 42s in Moscow… Is this some kind of early April fools joke?? If you enjoy braindead shooters, there are plenty of them on the market, boyo.
im sure they will find a way how to prevent this bullshit on large scale, there is plenty of ideas coming out of hundreds of rants in between
m2 carbine in normandy is also very realistic with avt and mkb spam
CoD 2 is a SP game that is nothing like Enlisted, but go off