Also the fact that most of the time, I’m the only one in the entire team who have top level guns especially PPSh, DP, SVT and PTRS so there are matches that I have to do multiple duty and I don’t have the luxury to hop in a tank at times because I have to make rally points myself. Soviets have yet to get a single T-34 in Moscow as they don’t have a definitive tank that can effectively fight Panzer IVs and 38ts with T-28 being too big with only sharpnel shell or T-50 with just a 45mm instead of 76mm.
Its not like Berlin where Soviets can get decent guns like DP and SVT early plus the PPS is a much better starter gun the 25 box mag PPD-34 and I don’t have to worry about team using shitty tanks because the T-34-85 is already available from the start with D-5T while I have a gold T-34-85 there where I can hop in depending on the situation.
Mmmh please… t50 will eat pz4 for breakfast. Hint: pz4 turret is poorly armoured. It can also front pen the 38t (if not angled). Same vs pz3j. T-50is the best tank in Moscow… but EVEN with that, fear not! For I’m almost certain the beautiful t34 is coming soon, maybe even next update, who knows.
MKBH.42 feels so weird in Moscow, like I wouldn’t field all of my guys with it unless there was a scopeless variant (which they might add). Although select fire guns like the FG-42, STG-44, BAR1918, etc, should be Assault class weapons imo.
The infamous fg42.
To be very honest, I find it overrated. It’s very imprecise at range, as such g43 is somewhat better…
I feel that ppl complaining about it don’t understand it’s usually in the hands of high lvl players… and as such experienced ones. Because the weapon itself is good, but not exceptional like ppl playing vs it claim. Jack of all trade master of none 🤷
But then again like we said, many ppl here prefer to blame their opponents toys than to admit they are bested by better players
I’ll even add they’re the ones believing that a matchmaking restricting equipment per side would solve their issues…
I’m not specifically just talking about the FG-42. Honestly, besides select fire weapons be made Assault weapons I’d like to see the rate of fire slightly capped on semi-auto’s because there’s no reason to take bolt-actions once you have good semi’s unlocked. Sure people use the “long range” argument but those engagements are just a waste of time when you could be helping with the objective. Semi-automatic rifles have so much killing potential in Enlisted right now, despite doing 12.0 hit points on average. It feels like I’m shooting fish in a barrel almost every match.
Capping the rate of fire on semi’s would also curb macro users, basically “legal” cheats in a way.
There are good arguments for and against capping the ROF on semi’s but I personally lean towards it as it less spam firing would likely make for a better game environment. It would probably shut up a number of complaints against the FG-42 as well.
Or make “helping with the objective” less relevant overall. I find it weird for the game to bring loads of different weapons from WW2, to then just focus on some imaginary battle for a single barn in a field.
