Okay, I admit I misremembered with it Breda, which had 2 seperate bomb drops. (My sense of memory isn’t what it used to be)
Whatever.
It was huge nerf to Ju188 nevertheless.
Breda just had 3 bombs so you always had one spare after the first set.
Devs disagree with you as that is the reason for it now beeing in BR 5.
1 Like
This same argument can be applied to G2, but okay.
Challenge it. I made a video specifically to challenge the G2.
The Only reason I dont challenge the ju188 is there is no 6x250 kg or equal to payload elsewhere (other than BR 5) atm
1 Like
If payload is the only decisive element based on what BR the plane is going to have. Then majority of planes could be in first 3 BRs, with like ±3 planes being BR4+
Jets excluding.
Or we could make planes to be available only BR2+, just like APC, MGs and so on.
I agree to it returning to BR3. The Main Can Barely Penetrate tanks on BR3
2 Likes
I find it interesting that there is no push back on this issue, In light of the reason I have raised (the other planes of equal).
I do really wonder what put this on the chopping block radar and nothing else…
You’re not allowed to make sense and stop talking about the elephant in the room.
This game has already become a propaganda game for the Allied powers,so it will likely be decades before we see any good updates for the Axis powers.And if players of this game develop it, will become a more balanced game.
1 Like
Great video!
G-2 cant even do half that damage and should again be BR 3.
2 Likes
Thank you for pointing out the elephant in the room
Got any clips to add regarding the other planes?
To my opinion wfr.gr.21 is a better AT option compared to HVAR and RBS-132, and M8 of course. But all of these can take most below-BR5 tank with a direct hit.
IL-2M slower but got bomb and better AA firepower. P-38 great maneuverability.
1 Like
Yeah. they are all very powerful in slightly different areas.
@Euthymia07-live @MajorMcDonalds not sure if you have seen this. Wondering if you would care to comment?
I am aware you have a neutrality to maintain…But the video i have provided makes it very clear. I suspect if people are being honest…anyone that flys all sides knows this…
I would appreciate even if it was noted
This subject I intend to keep bringing up as its another “seemingly uninformed” change amongst aircraft. (like the Narwhal belt change to all AP).
1 Like
I don’t care.
Just because Germany has no good attackers at IV is not a reason to overnerf the planes.
I agree, bring it back to BR III, it is a good plane but not game breaking or op by any mean.
1 Like
Bump!
1 Like
I hope we are not getting back into the powercreep being pushed based on 30 people liking posts on forum…
Ohh, wait…
I would rather see those planes going higher rather than opposite.
misused the phrase power creep…it was already at BR 3 the last year and a half. not even the most dangerous of the bunch…(the most dangerous are still there…and in reach of BR 1, unlike this one)
likes shouldnt be the most relevant. The reasoning/argument should. and its rock solid