Doesn´t that mean that the Ju188 would be better for a skilled player then? It´s the best CAS Axis has.
Right back ya
That´s such a massive cope. You must be living in a different reality. Then summarize what you want to say in a single sentence and I´ll debunk it for the 6th 7th or 8th time I don´t even know.
Was never my argument but that the damage a BF110 can do with it´s rockets against Infantry can be matched by a P-38. If anything you´re constantly misrepresenting my arguments to debunk easier. I should be the ones who´s mad because you keep wasting my time argueing in circles.
I would argue being able to kill tanks much easier makes it better at CAS because tanks are force multipliers wich need to be dealt with quickly. You don´t need Planes to kill infantry. Me and my rifle can do it too. The Ju188 outperforms the BF110 in killing power and it can defend itself well if the AI with the autocannon can land it´s shots.
That´s an example that favours your opinion. You didn´t debunk my example with this. You just refused to look at my example and made up one that favours your viewpoint. Wich funny enough doesn´t use the P-38 and BF110 but tanks wich are irrelevant to the conversation lmao.
You´re making it sound like M8 rockets can´t kill infantry at all wich is wrong so please stop trying to make it look like that.
I´m looking at the how both vehicles function in the actual game rather than solely at it´s statistics. Because like I mentioned it doesn´t matter if a BF110 could destroy tanks if it doesn´t do it as well and consistently as the P-38? You never adress how they actually perform ingame and hide behind what they theoratically could. Instead you repeat the same argument over and over again.
My experience ingame is worth far more because
- Normandy is my most played campaign and I´m pretty high level on both factions
- I adress how they perform in the hands of the average player wich is 99,9% of people you´ll be playing because I want to balance things on how the average player uses it rather than a sweaty Esport player for example.
Well this isn´t War Thunder. The gameplay, balance and unlock system works compleately different.
But that´s the thing, have you ever played even a single round where a single player was nailing the BF110 rockets on porpuse consistently? That´s another point where your argument falls apart because if nobody ever reaches that maximum potential it´s not a problem. If it´s not a problem why change it? You always argue with theoretics and never at the actual gameplay. Both rockets do something wich the other is worse in but both could fulfill both functions. I just think M8 rockets can kill infantry easier than WrG 21 can kill tanks.
At the end of the day I´m not even sure what you´re so fanatically arguing over? The Ju188 is a better CAS plane and still the Allies do better at CAS. They can have 2 CAS planes at the same time and are more adaptable in general.
If you can´t answer the important questions straight up and just dance around them and repeat your talking points I´m not sure why you even bother. The only argumeant you´re winning is the one inside your head and not with me since I don´t share your views.
It´s like you think you´re smart, but the way the average match goes contradicts what you´re saying. It´s always technically this in theory that but never what actually happens in the game, how an aveage player not the 1% of the 1% of the 1% play the game.
Like there´s a very small chance that if you fly in a plane you might die in a plane crash and thus you never want to fly in planes. But there´s only, I don´t know, 1 plane crash in 100000000 succesfull flights. Statistically insignificant then but you vehemendly insist that flying planes is deadly because technically it could happen anytime. That´s how you come across.