Battle Pass: Seventh Season of 2025

i exactly said it on my first wall of text you were the one who tried to switch it to only exclusivity

expect for the APC with a gun

Does germany Actually have anything exclusive/OP meta like it can totally break the game?

2 Likes

My proposal sounds better. And it’s even better not to change anything. An automatic rifle in the hands of an Assaulter is better than the same rifle in the hands of a Rifleman.

:frowning: The Italian BP plane just past was the same.

Only reason I get them is to save them for the day that custom ordnance is added…or they get given bombs…but yeah, until then…just an inventory item collecting dust

3 Likes

Why add a 5th (!!) Spitfire???
There are already 4 (!!!) spitfires in the game (3 of which are nearly useless coz no bombs)!
The 4th was an event reward that ended just 2 or 3 days ago…
And now add a 5th, inferiour version to the BP?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
This is nuts

1 Like

Oh, my bad.
In that case: This is not OP

This is not OP

This is not OP

This is not OP

This is not OP

This is not OP

We get 2 spitifres in like 2 days…but I’m complaining…what’s going on here man :sweat_smile:

1 Like

Woosah Bad Boys GIFs | Tenor

2 Likes

I hardly ever play Soviets BR5 so I forgot they had 15 round mags. :grinning:

1 Like

I was just pointing out that it’d been a long time since the last BP spitfire, is there another allied plane you would have preferred over the spitfire?

Yes well any other plane would be better I think…
Since there were already 4 spits in the game.
Nobody needs/wants nr. 5

And the most surprising: the event in which a spitfire was a main reward, has just ended a few days ago.
Now the new BP starts, why the hell choose another spitfire to add as reward?!?!?!
We just got one. A better one even!
It makes absolutely no sense at all

2 Likes

This weapon should have 25 rounds and should be something like the Fedorov Avtomat not 15 round rifle…

15 Likes

No, thank you.

I prefer a truly unique weapon over a reskin of what we already have.

The only reason people are pushing for change is because the weapon is supposedly not strong enough in their eyes.
So they are desperate to dig up any source that would be in line with their agenda to make this weapon more powerful.
To the point they’re becoming extremely toxic.

Well being bad isnt unique either.

But I think you are on to something - lets try making the gun worth its BP status by making the drawback (15 round mag, medium damage, limited to assaulters) being countered by some other amazing stats.

Actually, if theoretically body armor finally would get nerfed, it would one hit kill like fedorov. But fedorov has a bigger mag than select fire rifles, while this gun has a smaller mag.

Dispersion is already nice, but what else can this gun have to make it not literally obsolete to FG42?

1 Like

Those are generic problems hard to make into an item in a TODO list.

For the balance problems they should start experimenting with bot vs. bot capabilities perhaps, making loser team’s bots more potent against winning team’s bots perhaps. May not work, but I guess it’s worth a try.

The developer decisions often miss even when they are based on feedback (e.g. map preference system - they tried and failed).

Long term after TT done - I’m researching BR3-5 stuff and mostly play BR2 so don’t care.

Bad developed/incomplete mechanics or just pointless mechanics that may need a rework + bugs since game release - can you give some examples? The one that infuriates me is the gray zone stuff, and some bot problems.

I can list some features that are more focused and would make my gameplay experience better, like

  • what I mentioned, fixing the climb-to-the-top-of-the-window
  • add a “TO THE OBJECTIVE” command (so bots go there while I build my rally - pointing toward the objective marker and pressing X often fails in many ways)
  • or alternatively add a “CONTINUE DOING THIS, SWITCH TO NEXT” command so my engi builds the rally point even if I have only one engi, or the rifleman continues shooting out the window/manning the AA gun etc
  • add an “Upgrade to max” option so I don’t have to upgrade the weapon 3x
  • a bit bigger work perhaps: don’t call the crappy/half-hearted map veto system “Rate” as it’s not rating the match, and add a map preference system affecting whole theatres of war not just individual map/gamemode pairs.

With these changes for the rest of 2025, I’d be happy. :slight_smile:

The weapon had no 15 rounds magazine … it was 20 or 25. This thing was more of a LMG in real life something like the SIG KE 7.

7 Likes

Double standards at their finest and Germany is supposed to have garbage weapons which exceed everyone in every scale.

3 Likes

Well I said it with Type 99 there same is here however here we cant test this weapon we must look at sources only since its not preserved :

And there is other sources claim even 50 and 25 however the weapon only by it looks and the time period you can see that is something like the SIG KE7 since it was not a light weapon it was something like LMG. Probably between 5 - 10 KGs if not more. But will presume its on the heavy side something like 8.5 KG maybe 10 KGs.

5 Likes

And thanks to things like this out there existing This is why the moderators and developers were so scared to approach this topic and they did everything in their power to soften the blow.

And if we can just conveniently forget what happened in the last few months and what has been added to the game then there’ll be no concern but if you live in the world of reality you’ll see the drastic problem going on right now and a clear double standards.

1 Like

They must increase the mag size for sure its hard to believe its 15 bullets.

7 Likes

they can’t because they’re trying to save the Moscow and Tunisia player base which likes having the easy victories but in reality it’s killing the future veterans for the Soviets and the allies.

2 Likes