Idk how you compare its’ guns to 8 BARs, 6 extra rockets and 250kg bomb. Especially in suicide metagame and especially with bad airplane’s view of the ground.
A) no it’s not bad, i know this because i actively use it if i’m not using a tank
B) the guns also work as anti infantry weapons not just anti air so that makes up for the no bombs
C) the 21cm rockets’ warhead is x3 that of HVARs so if you want to convert those into HVARs then it would get 12 HVARS
D) p47 doesn’t get BARs, it gets .50s, which can’t really do much in CAS role
I’m not sure it will be efficient enough to not suicide especially after bomb’s nerf. It will only be a time and assault aircraft waste.
Ofc you can, but you have to see infantry for that. Other way you just shoot randomly hoping to hit someone. Also, again, you ammo isn’t big. You fire the ground - no ammo for air and you dye like a duck.
Difference in area you hit. More powerfull rocket doesn’t always mean you have same equality area your rocket hit. It can be reasonable argument against more armored targets but even there you have to hit target with rocket, not lay it nearby.
I see Browning mgs… or I misunderstand you? Nvm, yeah, understood what you’re about.
Idk about cas role but I was able to hit and damage Pumas and other weak targets.
no it’s surprisingly efficient if you don’t suicide with my average runs being around 11-14 kills
oor get; this memorize likely enemy movements and strike there, you can also see tracers while in the sky and the ammo thing isn’t what fucks the guns over in AA role, it’s the low shell velocities that do.
but it makes it great at clusters which will almost always happen in this game if you strike around point areas or if you know common enemy routes
It’s good but it’s not sufficient enough to waste time reloading. You can do more kills with infantry / tank for that time.
Previous bombers with unnerfed bomb were effective by killing 20-30 ppl per run. (sometimes more)
The problem - it’s not guaranteed and can be another time waste. You do maneuver, kill 1-2 men and waste time for another maneuver for extra 1-2 ppl… meh.
And what you do when there are almost no traces or no traces when you’re coming? Just waste your ammo again in hope you will hit something.
I use “usual” paths and places for enemies too but it’s not always guaranteed so I play infantry / tank and check myself before bombing runs.
There is also issue with respawn time of enemies. You know ± when your enemy will respawn and will be in certain place but someone decided to pick P38 or bomber and fly around.
It doesn’t always work. And it almost not working if you get skilled enemy team and they spread out sitting in shelters around the point.
you are also over estimated the communities ability to spread out
there not that good i have played against them only good at close range
And matches are won at close range. You don´t capture objectives by sitting on your spawn and sniping.
tell that to the Germans i see so many bush Wookie’s every round
Now that´s funny because playing as germans it feels like I do more attacking than the actual attackers
3 Likes
when I was playing Germans the majority of the invasion were in attack like a good 70%.
Heh me also, it keeps telling me to “return to the battlefield” which feels silly if you are in the enemie grayzone 
Pfff I just again got killed by allied snipers, again.
And they were supposed to be on the attack.
Guess there are bush wookies in every shape, sizes and sides!
1 Like
i swear the biggest enemy in enlisted isn’t the servers or the enemy team, it’s your own team
1 Like
Yes, I pretty much stopped playing the Panther, because there is no one capturing, if it is not me.
(also playing the Panther got rather boring pretty quickly)
It is crazy. They all seem to only camp, play save or whatever, Drink tea? Cook food while playing? I don’t know!
One could say, good, because Axis has to defend a lot. If only the team would camp around the cap point .
It is crazy!
yeah the only saving grace for most axis teams is that they are defending about 80% of the time