Soviet logic.
But. If you think otherwise, you are automatically a fascist, so don’t you dare!
4 Likes
btw i play soviet BR2 recently and i see at least 1 player every match using body armor… on BR5 i usually see multiple players with body armor per match.
2 Likes
There’s a lot of bias in your words, and you don’t seem to understand what you’re being told. The point is, this weapon wasn’t very good to begin with, even with all its bugs. I moved away from it by 2 BR and forgot about it altogether. It’s natural for someone of your level to label things, so I’m not surprised by your words.
imagine other nations playing with even worse guns… ppsh41 is still one of the best smg on BR3.
4 Likes
3 Likes
Are you perchance looking at a mirror while typing?
Your self description is truly uncanny!
(The ppsh41(box) wasn’t a good smg to begin with. 
you cannot make more biased ridiculous claim than this, eheheh)
3 Likes
nothing says forgotten better than making 4 topics about ppsh fix in last 2 weeks…
3 Likes
Well its variety, the one thing german is so OP about.
Wait.
In that very post, didn’t he say the mp41(r) is a truly op smg?
Yet ppsh41(box):
Ahahah talk about wriggling in quicksand
2 Likes
At least this statement will come from a person who has used Soviet weapons quite a lot, and yes, I left the 3rd BR because I dont like this weapon and I found it less effective than the PPS. People may have different opinions, but in general, it is not possible for a certain category of funny people here 
Mp have more damage
We need More BR2 and BR3 Please~
I’m really not that concerned about the PPsh itself, I don’t use it. Well, I’m really concerned about the unhealthy atmosphere that’s developed on the forum, where a handful of people’s rather specific beliefs are affecting the overall balance of the game in a rather strange way.
Just look at the reaction of people to a simple proposal, to add something so that there is more than 1 weapon, mostly it’s clowns or those who try to make it worse, and unfortunately, it starts to be perceived as the norm, but its not. Just a marginal person
yeah… those soviet mains are really bothersome… always insisting on keeping their advantages while no other nation has anything similar…
imagine if they actually wanted balanced game with no cosmetic that would reduce damage or have similarly performing weapons on same tier…
4 Likes
I wonder if he’s got sufficient cognitive acumen to know what the term “double standards” mean
It’s like he doesn’t even realize what’s happening here…
3 Likes
It’s an interesting twist, but it’s not entirely accurate when one side has only one weapon, while the other side has at least two. And it’s fair to say that if I noticed this fact, I would have suggested adding something new. Well, all I see here is a common grumble about removing or worsening something, but it’s honestly funny, as our friend here says.
If you’re talking about yourself in the third person, I’m not surprised.
I prefer using both pps43 and uragan than the ppsh41-Box, ppsh41box shoots too fast that every burst must count or ur just wasting ammo.
1 Like
i dont see how quantity of weapons has anything to do with their performance. germans have 10 BR2 smg and they still dont have anything coming close to pps43 or uragan.
2 Likes
You are wrong!
If those two were in any of the other 3 factions that’d be another story, of course.
2 Likes