But we do need to discuss premium content, no?
And as you say this one doesn’t have anything particularly bait-worthy at all - so people are reading stuff from previous posts into ones where there isn’t any baiting.
I didn’t see this - but if they did it was a REALLY BAD IDEA imo - they just give licence to troll where people should be ignoring or simply saying why they disagree then moving on.
It doesn’t change the fact that he is still trying to bait out toxicity in this post, just not as bad as previous ones. And sure, premium content can be discussed but it shouldn’t be ptw as the OP almost always tries to get it.
Everyone assumes he is baiting - has he said so? Why can’t these be actual held ideas?
And TBH while most people obviously do not like P2W it is still something some people don’t mind, so either hte Mods need to ban it outright, or it needs to be discussed civilly - what is happening here is childish and pathetic.
Because he always talks about how he has too much money to spend? Wants every object in game to be paid for? Will edit titles of his posts with clickbait such as him editing them to say (Popular Opinion) when they have 3 likes?
Lmao that’s so true
Now you’re trying to act superior because you have money. Real nice.
now you are being d*ckhead/ childish…
just trying to fit in with all the other kiddies who didn’t get their nap time 
No - I WAS trying to hold a civil discussion based on hte merits of proposals - being not in favour of P2W either - but no - can’t be done here - 'cos of no one else bothers.
I literally just listed some reasons why I think hes a troll. Your response is to insult everyone who’s not as wealthy as you. But yeah, thats a real civil response to my list of reasons. 
yeah, i agree that personal attacks are dumb, but tbh i think they do it cus they are “scared” that the devs will really take the “opinions” and will add them to the game…
I don’t agree with how everyone responds to his stuff either. Some people definitely take things too far in response.
Tracers - sure, as long as they don’t have some wierd, unrealistic colors then I have nothing against it.
Spiked ammo - I don’t think there is a place in Enlisted for such things - landmines are enough. Secondly, such ammo was not used by soldiers in their won weapons but rather left in magazines for enemy to capture it. So there is a no from me.
AP ammo - IF we ever see vitality perk replaced by armor then AP ammo for snipers is something that could be considered as a natural counter. Right now there is no need.
And please @67929529 stop asking for premium things that will affect the outcome of battle - that is P2W and the major part of community doesn’t want it. As you can see with tracers there is a possibility to have civilized disscussion but you cannot bait us like that.
If you look at the actual thread, you may notice that that part is the part that drew out toxicity. We could all tell in advance which part of this suggestion was going to be disliked. If he refuses to take care of that despite being warned about it, I will flag as that is obvious trolling. He has made a dozen suggestions by now that all got derailed for the exact same reason and this is now the new solution. We now just flag those posts instead of letting it derail into toxicity just like you are causing it to do as you can see with the responses. Flagging is the obviously cleaner solution.
It is not our issue that this guy cannot make a good suggestion without layering it into monetization in such a bad way nobody will like it. He is the one getting the flak/flags
nice civil discussion mate
Because I like the tracer idea he tcat and I hashed out.
The AP and Spiky shit needs to go though
tracer is a nice idea
But everything else is yet another bait for p2w crap
Wow old man shit pants in the thread, powerful
We actually did end up having a civil discussion btw
Yeah I agree with ya
Wtf have people with crafting? This is not a goddamn RPG.