The concept yes for sure. The actual function though is much different
4 Likes
I have a question, Should I explain why you’re wrong or assume it’s satire?
Kinda not sure on this one.
With me, satire. Always assume I’m satirical.
3 Likes
was nice to see ya the other day , kinda felt sad to destroy your kv1 x)
That’s very true. After I finished the German campaign I switched to the Soviets. I’ve been afraid a little bit because it’s a returning topic here that life as an Allied in Stalingrad is very hard but I think there is not much difference.
Good team mates counts more than weapons. Building rally points in usefull locations, spotting and marking tanks and larger infantry groups and of course going to the cap zone is more useful than playing Vassily Zaytsev with a top weapon and don’t care about the progress of the battle.
Especially marking is quite underrated in this game. When I spot flanking enemies I mark them with three marks to signal the direction where a new attack will come from. Mortar squads, arty and dive bombers also find their targets easier this way.
2 Likes
shouldn’t exist.
I won around 50-60% of my matches as commie there.
Jesus. This aint rocket sciene… or Tunisia.
2 Likes
Well. the Yankees still exist. Like the M1919 doesnt exist.
One day Soviets (stalingrad) will wake up and realize they have some of the strongest equipment and vehicles in the game.
…when the good players on axis max out everything and move on to soviet. I would love to play them to use their equipment. Just cant bring myself to do it at the moment.
Maxed out soviets and it wasnt that hard. Sure I won more time with the Axis, but I have a solid winrate of 72% for the soviets in Stalingrad and needed 20 minutes more playtime to do so. It is just, that the soviets suffer from the Zaytsev complex IMO. It is just so funny to see how many snipers are trying to climb the walls of Stalingrad instead of going for the cap. But hey:
“aint no fun without a sniper gun”