It’s not like the other maps are 1:1 representations of whatever battle they’re portraying. There’s tons of random objects, vehicle wrecks and terrain embellishments on every enlisted map. Also it’s not like it’s Antarctica! There’d be mountains, trenches, villages, ports, etc. Enlisted’s map designers should have plenty to work with.
It this case it should look similar to the real place since the part of the island where the battle happend is very small
Vehicles were not used in the battle of attu
Not realy, it is similar to antarctica ,it has hills some small rivers and ponds,but no trees or bushes and only one small village (20 very small buildings max).
But it has a ton of japanes built frotifications and some infrastructure.
there should be fog and here are some pitcures of structures and some bigger fortifications that could be an objective :
Why we must go for open fields people hate the pacific maps already because they’re this no you choose maps that’s literally just that genius idea for vehicle mains not so much when you want to play idk INFANTRY
My thoughts on this are that most of the existing “open” maps have about 30-50 buildings on average. It’s really not that big a deal to me to have a small village as one distinct objective, a trench line and fortification as another, a hill, etc.
I also want to reiterate that devs obviously take artistic liberties when designing maps prioritizing gameplay and then authenticity. 1:1 scale historically accurate map design has never been a feature in this game. Point being it would be very unlike them to make this map a barren open wasteland like some are saying.
I will say though the Aleutian Isles should probably not get added until we have the other highly requested battles like monte casino, sicily, iwo jima, etc.
My main reasons for wanting this in game are that it provides a new theater / region not depicted in any other game and only a few movies, new winter cosmetics for japan, and a ton of new map assets.