Pay to win and panzer 4 don’t belong in the same sentence
Isn’t that one just a copy and paste of the TT one?

Do not translate this guy’s name ![]()
5300 for the armored PZ IV J is just too much. Shame, I really like the look of it and its been on my want list for a while, even though I don’t use tanks that much. Especially considering I can buy a IS-1 45 for $35.
I get that most premiums are overpriced, but at least some consistency with the prices would be appreciated.


Thank goodness they didn’t throw in a decorated water bottle as a free gift.
Br4 seems the worst
SVT-38 has a mag too and sits at BR3. The G43 just has to be BR3 too.
Do that again, but with a red fox!
You know, just because eheheh
svt 38 has a slower reload and 14.4 dmg
…and what does actual counterpart, the G41, have?![]()
14.4. How much dmg does the g43 have?
sigh. I want sticky Kool Aid hands, again. ![]()
Wait a minute, wth is your profile pic? Lmao ![]()
Oh, a very typical Canadian ww2 soldier with a Bren lmg, a pint, good company and riding a flying moose ofc!
It’s obvious that this transitional event has left most players dissatisfied. The reward weapons have too small a magazine capacity, and the limited-edition, low-weight returning squads are overpriced with no discounts. I’ve said this many times before: for a game development team to achieve a win-win situation, you have to learn to ensure everyone gets a share, instead of the game developers stuffing a large portion of the pie into their mouths first and then claiming it’s enough for everyone to share. That’s pure nonsense.
You’re absolutely right. If the historical campaign mode in Enlisted were still available, this Panzer IV Ausf. J from the 10th SS Panzer Division “Nordic” would likely have played a significant role in the Battle of Berlin. However, with the historical campaign mode closed, coupled with the current matchmaking system that mixes Tier III tanks, all Panzer IV sub-models are at a disadvantage. Even as infantry fire support, it’s almost indistinguishable from a lower-tier Panzer III. Therefore, the strongest tank now is the Tiger II, followed by the Panther, and lastly the Tiger. So, unless Enlisted adopts a separate matchmaking system for I through V, 5300 gold is currently only enough to buy a limited-edition Panzer IV camouflage.
Yeah, just looking at the stats alone, the recoil and dispersion values of the G43 and other BR 3 weapons are pretty much the same.
All the other BR 4 guns that used to be on par with the G43 have already been nerfed.
Logically, this old weapon should’ve gotten adjusted too.
But… I just don’t get it.
A lot of people on the forums seem to think the magazine-fed rifle should be the face of BR 3.
Even some German players don’t want the G43 to be nerfed.
It’s so weird to me.
As for the Japanese ones, it’s just because the greedy DF is trying to make money, turning all the magazine weapons into gold unlocks.
Finally, here’s a useful suggestion for the developers: if you want all the limited-edition squads from before the server merge to play their proper role, please adopt a +/- 0 tier matchmaking system. Otherwise, with the current mixed tier system, players who paid for these squads can’t use them effectively because their base stats haven’t been buffed, and weapon switching is restricted. Once placed in higher tiers, they’re left vulnerable to attacks. Therefore, it would be best to separate tiers I through V, so that even if all the limited-edition historical squads return, they’ll have their own place to perform at their best.
The prices are consistent. Pretty much all premiums that were previously removed from sale and then brought back have a higher price. That’s the real context. To compare it with not time limited premium is simply just fallacy.
