one is a machine gun designed for sustained fire, the other is a semi-automatic rifle designed to be fired 10 times a minute. Its no brainer to figure out that AVT-40 wont last long in full-auto.
5 Likes
Even modern selectfire rifles aren’t really used in full auto - in the context of Enlisted where everyone is constantly mag dumping with rifles this shouldn’t really matter.
I say - if the gun had a different rate of fire in the real world? Why not change it.
First the rates of fire should be implemented correctly - and then should the gun be balanced accordingly. This now also would effect other guns as well.
STG 44 had a rate of fire of 500, this should be corrected and then afterwards a way should be found to make that gun still effective in BR5 ( like higher damage/accuracy)
3 Likes
500-600 rpm actually, while AS-44 had around 600, but both have more with about 10% for some reason.
The only difference is that fire rate actually matters for ARs since they are 2 hit kill while SF rifles are one hit.
3 Likes
Yes
Do you even know why machineguns swap their barrels?
Apparently not… Maybe you should just shut up when talking about thing you do not even understand.
A small hint, it is not because the old barrel is totally ruined and unuseable just like how it is described here…
The machinegun would swap barrels in before it would take damage at all or cause premature dischage bullets cooking off due to the heat of the barrel.
Once a barrel change was initiated the old barrel would be replaced by a spare barel and the old barrel would be put aside for a few minuts to properly cool down. Once it cooled down enough it could be used again and replace the “new” barrel. By cycling through the same 3 or 4 barrels again and again a machine gun could keep all its barrels from overheating and in turn from any additional burden on the rifling from continious fire.
Any sorce for that or did you just make that up?
A machine gun that cant shoot 50 rounds when it is issued with 50 round boxes by default would be very stupid so I highly doubt that claim of yours. Also again a barrel swap is still far away from having your rifling melting and your gun ruined just like how it happens on the AVT.
1 Like
continuous fire and practical fire are not the same thing so try again
and where is the link to the source of this nonsense?
The barrel of a machine gun is different from the barrel of a rifle, in case you didn’t know. So that’s normal.
Its no brainer to figure out that this applies to both FG-42 and T-20 and Auto Hey
why are you so aggressive? Too much internet today? Go outside, touch the grass.
Yes, I was wrong here, there is no need to make such a drama out of it, especially since people before you have already pointed out my mistakes to me.
- The barrel life is 6000 rounds when firing 50 rounds per minute, after which the rifle was allowed to cool. Continuous fire brings the life down to 150-200 rounds.
Name AVT-40
Calibre 7.62
Magazine size 10
I support the idea of adjusting the magazine size of AVT-40 to real world conditions
2 Likes
yes yes, AVT-40, SVT-40, what’s the difference
tell me what is the name of full auto modification of svt40? maybe avt40?
It can be called whatever you want, but these are different rifles.
if it makes you feel better… svt40 and avt40 are totally different rifles… they have absolutely nothing in common…
True, how ever this was your claim that its same as FG42 or MG42 so burden of proof lays on your shoulders.
Im not going to do your work.
Id guess at bottom of page ?
But then again, considering the fact that the production was discontinued rather quick due to that weapon being absolute carbage Id say its quite pointless to argue about it.
If something was sht on soviet standards it definitely was bad then.
but I didn’t say that for sure. Can you explain why you decided that?
it’s not there.
You Will realize that increasing the rof of guns with smol mag is a curse
Anyways Nice nerf 
1 Like
Are you absolutely sure that they have the same barrels?
