It would be cool to add medals on soldiers in game. So we could see their medals on them.
Add new medals also for different tasks.
100 tanks destroyed - bronze tank destruction medal, 200 - silver 400 - gold.
100 wounded and healed himself - bronze wound badge 200 - silver 400 - gold.
It would be cool to see them on other players. youd know theyre veterans
6 Likes
Personally I’d preffer more historical rewards and conditions. Like silver tank destruction bagde for destroying 3 tanks as one soldier (idealy in one life).

It would fit the lore imo.
5 Likes
Thats what i mean historical but for more tank kills. Getting 3 tank kills in 1 life isnt that diffcult. Now getting 400 tank kills will take awhile and people who will see you in combat wearing it will know that you are a skilled tank hunter.
Also gun kill marks on barrels of tanks/AT guns would be pretty neat.
1 Like
If you are a good player. Most people don’t kill even one tank in a battle.
More like you have enough time to play. Even the biggest noob can have this medal if he plays long enough. That’s not how “rewards for skill” should work.
Actually I made a post about it. Decal I would like to see in the game
I hate to link my topics to other peoples’ topics but at the same time I won’t write the same thing 3 times and pretend it’s new.
1 Like
If you see that someone has a golden tank medal on his uniform. Youll be damn he destroyed more than 400 tanks alone with this soldier? I bet hes good at killing tanks since he has all of this experience.
To be honest it would have to be a pretty big medal for me to notice it in battle. Especially from inside my tank. Or really anywhere else.
And if I let enemy troops get that close to my tank in battle … then I deserve to get knocked out …
Maybe you should just paint a big gold target on your chest … There is reason why combat soldiers don’t where medals or show rank in battle …
I kind of see your point.
But still, I’d preffer more historical conditions of giving a medal. Imo it would add to immersion.
1 Like
Historical and immersion in the same sentence in enlisted

3 Likes
Friendlies could see them too. Not only for tankers. Also for regular infantry
Yeah the game truly has taken an unfortunate detour by becoming as arcadish as possible. Right now asking for more historical correctness is hopeless. We should already be happy we’re not seeing a T95 doomturtle in Normandy and a Kingtiger in Moscow lel
2 Likes
I mean it arcadish but it still feels like WW2. I know i know. But come on. Most of the uniforms are from that battle, there are no katanas or other crap on soldiers, most soldiers wield weapons that were mostly in the same time period or battle. (Im looking at you Jumbo and MKB42)
But still it feels like this is what WW2 could have looked like. Not like BFV.
I am sad tough about them removing friendly fire from artillery, mortars, grenades, bombs. Theres no risk putting down arty everywhere now, there is no risk bombing targets close to allies. Theres no risk throwing a grenade into friendlies/ Its gone and its sad
1 Like
What I hoped Enlisted to be was an Red Orchestra but with a F2P vibe and with more tanks and planes. I truly enjoyed this game but right now its somewhere between BF V and RO with more and more shifting tendencies to BF V.
I would only endorse friendly fire if their were appropriate penalties/sanctions given to abusers. Otherwise some people will do it to grief others …
1 Like
Yes of course there must be penalty maybe -15 xp per kill. And if you get to many free fire kills youll be kicked
Perhaps as they expand on custom battles they will add options that will allow for friendly fire …