As stated go play BFV. This is more of a milsim your entire “it isnt historical isnt a defense” crap doesnt holdup as that’s the entire point of the game.
No, go away and play BF5
Do not flame this topic please.
“Enlisted where you act as an infantry squad leader, tank crew or an aircraft pilot. The weaponry, soldier’s uniform, appearance and capabilities of the vehicles in the game are in line with historical facts.”
But oh wait… 3% of the Red Army soldiers where females…
This game is definitely not a milsim. It’s a milsim-like arcade MMO shooter.
Female combatants - English speaking section / Mess Room - Enlisted
We had a big thread about it already.
First of all, instead of having a civilized discussion you came to this topic to flame and provoke me (proven by the fact you keep calling me “He/him” even though I am a biological female). I understand there is a great deal of the internet and video-games being a very male culture, and I don’t mind it until you start insulting around like this. This topic was meant for a suggestion to add different models to a GAME. Not a topic discussing the historical accuracy of it, definitely not a topic promoting feminism. Just don’t flame the topic and move on - You’ve already said you disagree with my suggestion. I respect your opinion.
Yes I saw it and it came down to “but it’s not historically accurate” and “boohoo femenism”. This one is made to harshly deal with such attempts of flaming. There will be no discussion about feminism, historical accuracy, warping and political agendas here.
There are some wierd weapon and vehicle choices, but as you can see big part of the community is agaist them (examples like Pz III B in Moscow, Panter F in Berlin etc.)
And what would prevent players from creating fully female squads? So then we would have possibility to have battlefields where at least 50% of soldiers are women. Enlisted tries to recreate atmoshpere of real WW2 battles, I really don’t know how that would be any close to real atmosphere
Only Russians have confirmed cases of women fighting alongside men in direct combat, but for most of the time not even on the frontline (there were snipers, pilots, few tank crew soldiers, partisans). Women were 3% of Red Army personell, and that inclodes paramedics, nurses, doctors etc.
So you just don’t want major and crucial argument that is against involvement of female soldiers and see it as “flaming”.
Warthunder is not Enlisted. In WT there are WW2 tanks fighting with Cold War tanks, but I don’t think that would be good in Enlisted, don’t you think?
If the Nation had them why not
The market dont wanna have another inflation of females in WW2 games. Look at BFV… look at your post(s). NOBODY liked them and nearly no one defends your position. Praise the market, Miss. The market is wise and thats the reason why they will never add females aside as possible gold squads.
You can’t have disscussion about “introducing new female models” to a game like Enlisted (that is advertised as realistic) without argument about historical accuracy. That just can’t work. I really don’t want to flame here.
Female soldiers just don’t fit the setup of the game. It isn’t even (at least not in my case, I don’t speak for the others) fighting “bohoo feminism”. Big part of the community came here after fail of BFV looking for the game that would be realistic and accurate, but at the same time more “player friendly” than milsims like Post Scriptum or Hell Let Loose. Arcady mechanics and wierd vehicle/weapons choices don’t justify ignoring history completely and putting female soldiers on the battlefield not only for Russia, but for all nations.
preach
I don’t feel like implemanting females into the game in a way you wants is good. We will most likely gets some kind of a premium squad like soviet sniper squad.
Like we have in War Thunder where we have some kind of a anime helicopter.
Soliders in US and USSR are alredy diverse this just proof you have not been playing the game or just playing germany.
They just skipped the skins for US cause they are lazy and the ratio of mongols setc. in the Red Army is still higher than the ratio of females lol.
There is no way I would want female soldiers, the amount of them would be extremely rare, as people say I think given the disaster in bfv with it’s equality ruined the game for a lot of people.
If you want to be a female go play COD, BFV, let’s not have this discussion any more. I really like EL, spent a fair bit on premiums, if this game wants more money don’t do it!
No. Go play shitty battlefield if you want that.
The game has divisions. Just add divisions that had female soldiers, like the very well known 588th or the 25th rifleman for Russia, which would be super sweet.
so why should they add female soldieres to factions that didt have femal troops?
only nation that then needs female soldires is the USSR since they had a female sniper battalion, and the night witches.
there were no femal soldires on the german or amarican side
Well, Im fairly certain not many actual armies had any women on fighting units but mainly non frontline units. Only possible cases could be bands of varous ragtag resistance units!