Yes)
8 Likes
Thanks for your reply. That’s good to hear.
It‘s maybe unfair for Moscow players。 Berlin’s player have almost every super weapon。
5 Likes
No. We will exchange them at a fair rate.
8 Likes
Very good improvements expected, but please do not forget the gameplay improvements, the following video shows the biggest problem that Enlisted currently has and since they have considered it a feature, the video will make it sufficiently clear how it is affecting the gameplay in obvious ways.
1 Like
We do not plan this.
17 Likes
Good, I don’t think I’ll have use for 1,000 silver troop orders anytime soon. Thank you.
2 Likes
War Thunder has got a WAY worse F2P formula than Enlisted.
Unlike Enlisted, where everything you buy in game is “buy once, use forever for free”, in WT you have to pay game currency not only to buy new vehicles, but also to repair them if you lose them in battle, and to buy new ammo.
Due to this system being exploited both to “balance” vehicles and to encourage premium purchases, as you progress the tech trees, you progressively spiral down into a downright predatory economy, where you eventually by playing a match you LOSE more currency than you earn.
The worst part is, buying premium account doesn’t even solve the problem, it just raises a bit the bar of sustainability.
While lower tiers are very generous, hooking you up and allowing you to (slowly) stockpile currency, top tier economy is purposefully designed to be unsustainable.
It was the neverending greed of WT economy, where it doesn’t matter how much you pay, there is NEVER a point where it’s enough to let you just enjoy the game, that eventually drove me away after years of daily playing.
Edit: that’s why I hope I never see Enlisted opening the can of rotten worms that is “repair/resupply costs”.
16 Likes
Idk, I suddenly lost all motivation to play at all. This will be a change that either breaks or makes the game.
I understand and see on daily basis that you have massive problems with splittered playerbase and that this problem slowly chokes the game.
But throwing every campaing in one hat and giving up basically everything that sets this game apart from countless other WW2 games (beside the bots). I dont know, I have a bad feeling about this.
6 Likes
Let’s see
Moscow end game weapons are also very good, the only downside is the lack of FG-42 and AVT
Yes. Even before the appearance of this mechanic, we will allow mass selling of weapons in one of the QoL patches.
4 Likes
You can always play historical ones on customs.
We don’t want Moscow and Stalingrad to be the new home of is2 and AVS44. I like it the way it is where different battlefields have different equipment. There is no reason to remove the option to keep playing the way it is and be forced into berlin late game matches if I want to play my moscow axis army with scoped mkb
9 Likes
I guess. I cant use a white camo on a soldier in berlin
Will that work also with weapons like mortars, flamethrowers, Panzerfausts etc? + ofc other equipment like knifes, flasks and mines?
2 Likes
Currently Italy does not have a trooper 1 squad, will this be added with the new tech tree system?
1 Like
Do you really think someone will play thoose? Its just an “excuse” gamemode, that they can say: “You dont like the new direction? Then go play historical battles.” But nothing more. Just like the lone fighter mod. Noone played that.
2 Likes
Imagine Enlisted being full-loot game. Your soldier died in battle? You need to enlist new one and buy equipment to him as well.
This isn’t good enough because there is ever barely 1 full custom server. There is no incentive to make your own server to play the way you want because no one will join.
This is why it’s better to leave it the way it is, it is more historical and fun than jumbos in the pacific or is2 in moscow
2 Likes
I can answer like this. squads will be smaller. We will abandon their large number in favor of a deeper leveling of the units themselves.
5 Likes