Unfortunately, the English language is too narrow to accurately express the player’s intended attitude to this.And if I wanted to send the game there, I would have sent it six months ago.
Free player play,you can play vs real player,not bot.
I’m not asking you to deprive premium of all benefits, am I? Where did I even write about the deprivations of bp bonuses and benefits?I just suggested allocating one aviation slot for all players…
It’s like some kind of insane greed.
Spelling in the morning is not my strength.
But yeah, as I just posted, the few dozen people making so much noise on this forum should just quit.
It’s all noise and posturing, they won’t quit and the empty threats will only make the devs realize that
they can keep pushing the monetization.
It’s called free market capitalism. The market sets the price of products.
And it does sound like your threats were empty……you want the monetization to ease up?
Then tens of thousands should quit the game now, that WOULD be noticed.
Oh, it’s so nice to single yourself out in some kind of separate group.
If I have complained about something since the release of the game in the OBT, it is only on
1.Stuka
2.No slot for aviation.
Definitely premium is bought for an additional slot, and not for accelerated experience.
You look like a defender of your purchase.However, where do I encroach on the benefits of the premium?It can still give 2 slots, it will still increase the speed of gaining experience, increase the reserve, etc.
Disparity with vehicles between paying and F2P players is something that I was trying to point out for a while now, but it seems nothing will ever come out of it. The only chance it might have is giving all the strength and frequency of “muh mortar useless” etc. discussions to it.
But I do not believe players should receive F2P slots without any effort, they need to put at least average effort to grind for it in order to make it somewhat fit F2P model.
Unlocking active squad slots through grind - English speaking section / Suggestions - Enlisted
There is no way that anyone in the right mind can consider locking ability to purchase squad slots behind double paywall (premium + purchasing the slots) a fair deal.
The “but it would devalue premium” bs is also wrong. Premium and purchased slots will still have all its benefits, including the much wider options (flexibility due to the ability to use many more squads) that F2P players will never be able to even dream about. And that is all good because paying players should always get fair benefits.
HOW is that lowering value of the premium? It doesn´t.
This is some kind of crazy defense of own purchase.
it has nothing to do with it . lol
read his answer fully first.
If I understood you correctly…
I mean, sure, it is understandable that anyone who already made purchase have certain reasons and enough fears to defend current system no matter how wrong it is, simply because it already costed him/her money. But is that seriously the mindset that should be always followed?
For people not inclined to purchase premium in order to buy more slots, keep attention on future events or twitch drop campaigns or such, which might award premium time, then buy slots during that.
Or, alternatively, purchase of more slots shouldn´t be gated behind having premium in the first place just like in the most games that are out there.
You are not addressing the actual problem, in fact, this reply pretty much ignores it and only attempts to just give some “painkillers” for a symptom to just wait it through for small possibility that one day, x or y might happen… or maybe not.
of course I disagree with leaving the purchase behind premium wall, but as long as it is that way, this is the way to work around it.
I mean, I’m not a dev, it’s not like I can solve the issue.
It is right.But did he really pay just to have both a tank and an airplane at the same time, unlike free players?Seriously?
And what else?I don’t see anything here except pseudo protection of his purchase.
Although no one said to limit premium
knyaz ur op is not bad but i strongly disagree with ur seeming constant assault on alternate opinions. ur just accusing others of far-fetched assumptions based on them having different ways of thinking
Nothing like that, I just see that you want to leave a privilege, uniqueness, in the form of an additional slot for vehicle.
As it is, I am always glad of someone else’s opinion.
that may be the case but u still seem to be making ur replies based on assumptions and the way (tone, etc) u have been replying are unnecessarily accusatory
Maybe, or maybe it’s already clear that the owners of something will protect their privileges?
Although this is not the main feature of the premium at all.
If you were so offended, then I’m sorry.
that may be so, but isnt it better to give ppl the benefit of the doubt unless thers concrete evidence?
np, i wasnt
No better.