A sketch of how to restrict all BR 5 battle rifles to 2 shots

Not really. if every gun is restricted to two shots, then the type hei auto will come out outstanding, with its large mag size, goof ROF, incredible full auto accuracy. Many people got used to the sights.

I also object that Japan is dead. at least, on the US, EU servers, japan stomps the russian and americans regularly.

the playerbase is very much alive, just small.

but more alive than the ussr playerbase imo.

AVS-36-20 has an even higher rate of fire. Accuracy is also excellent.

IMG_3073

Accuracy is a directly correlated to recoil… which recoil is also adversely affected by a higher rate of fire.

Is a console player seriously going to tell me about recoil?)

I applaud you on your judgement based solely on the suffix of my name.

What do you mean by that though? That it’s harder? Because it’s lessened by 30%… now when i was playing on PC for a bit i never bothered to invest in the AVS but i do see its advantage in closer range combat.

So perhaps i shouldn’t speak on that aspect for both of those reasons… but to say its accuracy is better… what? by volume of fire? The fire rate is completely unnecessary and makes it worse in that aspect.

This has me intrigued though… i know there were some guns i personally felt we’re easier to control on PC so perhaps i’ll try it out.

Yes.

1 Like

Where are the BR5 weapons?

I had them in an old account.

1 Like

What a clown you are - are you still only trying to win arguments by discrediting your opponent?

Recoil can be controlled - dispersion can’t.

1 Like

Well… considering the fact they are only playing in low BR… i wouldn’t consider their opinion even valid in this topic.

However if they have an old account? Eh… why don’t you play on that? Because you’d rather do the grind again?

He said he had another account. Also there is zero reason for him to even care if he only played BR1 matches.

Again, discuss with him - not against him.

Who cares? Does it matter why he does what he does, or is what hes trying to discuss the whole point of the forum?

Good for him, to say something like that on public forum. Let’s pretend it doesn’t violate EULA’s terms.

Thats non of your business either - he could have an alt for what ever reason and it being totally valid.

Maybe he lost his old account? Maybe he played on some friends acc? Many possibilities.

There is zero reason to attack him.

How did I attacked him?

I just said it for his own good. Maybe he doesn’t know it. So next time he wouldn’t be so eager to share such information openly.

I personally couldn’t care less whether he has one or one billion accounts.