I didn’t change the question, I answered it and asked you a question back. Why shouldn’t it be unique guns?
1 Like
The 6rd finally has competition 
Marketing Hype is not the same as good marketing
No you didn’t, and yes you did.
He said that he was glad that the Chauchat wasn’t the normal LMG as it’s that bad.
first of all, define uniqueness.
because the mg 30 along side chau chat weren’t unique or rare at all.
according to a famous:
the mg30 wasn’t unique at all. it was one of the standard mgs of the wehermacht. something that we should see in the main line up of grind insthead of being in a over proporsonal and overpowered squad full of them. it’s just utterly unfair for the soviets.
while the chau chat it’s… meh, i gues they are fine. but no match for their counter part.
and no. this marketing system just kills the game to get those 30 bucks off people.
might work in fast terms. but surely not on long ones.
oh and yeah, i don’t think we should discuss about the colorfull and fair balance that brings over the balance. because i’m sure we are:
1 0 1 not breaking the balance at all. 
i mean, hey at least he has been honest including the try part.
but it’s getting ridicolous and i really feel bad for him putting his face trying to work his best.
I think Keofox meant “I” instead of “We”. But they aren’t in control.
i know.
If I remember correctly it lost against MG13 in competition for wehrmacht’s MG.
Wouldn’t the Chauchat for Germany, and Maxim-Tokarev for Soviets work fine?
1 Like
no you IDOT ( luv ya ) you are just reversing the issue.
1 Like
yeah it did.
but nontheless those mg were still present on the front line as second choise of relayability.
eventually outclassed by mg 34 and other mgs as well.
( for the main reason of magazine capacity, fire per minuts, and above all, weight )
How so? If both LMGs are low RoF, they wouldn’t out-DPS the normal LMGs.
So that is what you ment.
I thought you wrote that it was main german MG. My bad.
nah, don’t worry. it’s fine.
i’m glad to see someone that actually cares about details now days to be honest.
1 Like
because they are not the equal.
slow fire rate =/= same role to cover
weather it’s debatable that an MG has to cover the role of cover ( sorry for the poor choise of words, but i can’t come up with something better), they are still pretty much different. and the chauchat should be used eslewhere, or like i suggest in another thread, replace the mg30 to make it fair.
because having germans with more mgs than bolt actio rifles is stupid and pretty much off.
the magazine out class the other.
just like in the main line up. the vz is somewhat equal to the madsen. and should be like that.
1 Like
IIRC the M-T is a belt-fed drum magazine, which would have like triple the reload time of the CC.
1 Like
Yup, chauchat was ment as fire and move weapon while maxim tokariev was HMG converted to LMG. They wouldn’t have the same usage even with simmilar stats.
1 Like
It’s unique in the context of the game, that shouldn’t even need to be said.
You’re grasping at straws here.
i don’t really think so.
i did not made anything up unlike someone eventually did in the main web site.
blain them, not me.
although, i don’t like getting fooled like this.
do you?
and i’ll state clear that i do agree with what @24811726 said above.