30vs30 squads is fine.
In Lone fighters there are no AI ( if its set that way ofc), therefore the stress on servers are much lower, it should allow waay more players
4 Likes
I am more concerned about the number of player in the solo mode, at least open to 200 is OK!
60 squads has least 60*5 = 300 soldiers, i want at least 200 players solo mode!
1 Like
200 player limit means we can enable more aircraft and more tanks. It must be more funny
That’d be some new level of gameplay.
But requires totally new maps.
2 Likes
Lone Fighters: 50vs50 with bots is when framerate starts to drop
100vs100 runs fine apart from micro-stutters
Hi, i see you in the game. Your map is really dark…
I am aware. Its due to the randomized time of day which i can’t get rid of. it shouldn’t be this dark…
In fact, the map is now large enough.
Just need to set the battle zone larger
I’m testing 150vs150 now
100vs100 should not be exceeded.
a mistake?
no.
quite the contrary.
on the other hand,
enjoy it until it last.
devs are probably gonna limit those as well.
just like xps, and bots capacity…
2 Likes
Can we earn xp on a custom mod match?
I have played 1 so far and I did leave mid match to join a friend and didn’t noticed if I got something or not.
nope.
currently it is not possible
( unless you find bugs which allows you to earn something as happened with my first mod match 
but… it was 6k reducted of the 0.2x. so a normal custom match without players basically. )
2 Likes
No, this will take the game to the next level.
Do you know ARMA? The game “Dayz” “Squad” and “PUBG” are mods that originated from ARMA.
1 Like
After your tests I think the Server Performance Cap is 150 vs 150 in solo mod.
At least in 100 vs 100 solo mod everything works fine.
Anyway, Gaijin should allowed us create a 50 vs 50 solo mod at least. Right?
1 Like
Let’s hope so.
50v50+would be dope.
With Atleast 4 tanks/planes per team… Uff would be amazing!
2 Likes
I know.
Gonna make a little suggestion then.
1 Like
ain’t gonna happen unfortunately.
it has been since the alpha that we wanted to increase the battles and areas.
now, thanfully to the editor, we can make it happen. ( although no official xps )
but devs refused back then, and still refuses to make things bigger.
main reasons are, they are not sure with stability performance with the low end spec of computers ( since it’s a free to play and they claim that you can run this game on low ends. would do them no good if it wouldn’t be able to. )
and they want to keep the action pacted in a small area.
they are not a huge fun of " dead ends " so to speak…
now, we can only hope some of us make good mods ( good enough for devs ) to actually introduce them and add experience with no reduction.
even there, there are more quetions marks than check lists.
but, we can hope.
( i missreaded… my bad… giro. but still. point stands for those who are curios on why 50v50 are not in the game by " default " )
5 Likes
Well I know.
This game still doesn’t have ultra low settings btw, and never will.
Well, we can hope or we can make it ourselves.
4 Likes
The match was pretty smooth for the majority of the time but at the start of the last objective, it started to have some really big performance issues, i think it’s because there was too many players in one single area at the same time and it doesn’t help that there was no limit in aircraft spawns…+ Stalingrad bombers…+ A shit ton of destroyed tanks everywhere… I’m most impressed this only started to happen after the 40minute mark
1 Like