That would do way more decompression than adding BR VI, hell even making it so that BR III cant play into BR V would already help a lot.
All the paratroopers are basically P2W as long as there is no TT one. I havent really played into that IJ one, but BR I paratrooper picking up a MG-34 from his box and moving down guys with Mosins isnt all that fairplay too.
having more brs would require more people to begin with.
if we struggle with 5brs because there are only two matchmakers, adding one would not benefit anyone ( or change much ).
we would need a more tight 1± mathcmaker with each br.
but since we don’t have enough people, br 1v2v3 & 3v4v5 will keep being a " thing ".
otherwise, we would have to make queues longer ( which no one likes )
or, add bots to fill matches with that said 1± br rule.
and DF Does not like that.
1 Like
I would prefer a 40-50 sec more MM, cause if i get my BR I-II lineups matched into BR III i will just desert anyways. Maybe if the MM would be better quality we would have more players.
Nothing makes a newbie drop a game quicker than getting rolled over by others with way-way superior gear. Im short of new with this game too, but with my limited experiance with BR III MM im 100% sure that i am not interested in playing anything above BR II with the current MM groupings.
1 Like
I just said that because idk how an additional br would work for japan because of their lack of variety in infantry weapons
I like to play with one logic quite often: if we double the amount of BRs while also increasing the amount of BRs being playing in a match, as in having 10BRs instead of only 5, but all being BR±2, we would on the first look not change anything - but we could have the option to better fine tune vehicles and gear.
Yes. The biggest issue is the variety of stuff at BR5. No one who has the STG will use the MKB or MP-43, unless you’re really weird like me you won’t use the PPD over the PPSH, etc.