Nope! When I have at least 1-3 competent teammates Allies III is 100% completely capable of defeating and overwhelming enemy V’s
Wow you really are something, huh?
What’s difficult to understand that you cannot balance something based of playerbase.
Some principe gaijin shouldn’t balance vehicles in war thunder out of statistics.
You as skilled skilled player might compete sometimes against br5 with your mighty br3 equippements,
but most “normal” players who play this game won’t.
You personal experiences stays subjectif, it cannot represent the whole.
Whilst 8 rounds semi-auto vs 20 rounds full-auto is objectif. It’s numbers.
Then they should stay out of BR III. Go play BR I, II, IV, or V. You got 4 whole BR’s to enjoy that are all ±1. Let me enjoy III
who do you think is more likely to win, team with 10 human players and BR3-5 equipment vs team with 10 human players and BR3-5 equipment or team with 5 human players with ±1 BR equipment vs team of 10 players with ±1 BR equipment?
Mate, what im trying to say is that why only us - japan don’t have br3-4 & br4-5 matching whilst all other nations have it.
It has nothing to do with how’s the win rate or how many people there are
If only the game was intelligent enough to add each BR in equal numbers. Lol. That way someone should have access to something capable of dealing with the big bad, evil tank but just chooses not to. Making it a failure of team rather than “unbalanced” teams, which is what the real problem is 90% of the time. Your teammates are garbage, so you get curb stomped cause they can’t clutch up and do their job
Yes we do. It’s a soft rule all the same across the board
except it has everything to do with it. idk what is so hard to understand that for MM to work it needs minimum amount of people every minute or two to guarantee a full match. if you introduce more MM queues you need more players otherwise you will get half full teams in match. currently japan doesnt have enough players for ±1BR in MM and every other nation has.
Keep believing that
It goes back to the first thing i said,
“Not having enough player” is not a valid argument.
Because there’s not enough players therefore you implement something irregular and against players will.
But then that irregularity only makes players to play less.
And it goes again and again.
It’s a circular reasoning.
Why would you play japan br3 which faces br5 weapon, when you can play other nations and not face br5?
Delusional
it is valid argument. just cause you dont like it doesnt make it any less valid.
here is same question to you. why would you play japan BR3 or BR4 or BR5 with half of team filled with human players and getting roflstomped when you can play other nations and get full human teams and not getting roflstomped?
I’d rather play with bots with similar weapons as me, rather than humans with ho-ri, super pershing, full-autos whilst i have br3 weapons.
Think as if you were a new player, just got into br3, and you see ho-ri, super pershing, hvar rockets and full-autos whilst you having br3 weapons.
Sure it’d be a very fun and encouraging game as a noobie right?
If you consider that a good game, i don’t know what to say more
and i wouldnt. think that most people would rather play with human players in MULTIPLAYER game, rather than with bots.
is it ideal? no. but it is less worse option between 2 choices.
I really doubt the suicide infantry’s intelligence.
For example, just now
Many times I just attack a certain route.
But the enemy is like livestock on the assembly line
Keep taking this route that will be bombarded
The first person on the opposite side has an airplane medal
But his bombs never came close to me
The enemy has at least 3 players with 57 and 75MM tanks
But they never try to hunt me
Only one person tried to attack me with an anti-tank rifle in the entire game (only once)
He succeeded in destroying the tracks.
I originally wanted to blow him up into the sky
But I can’t find someone
certainly
The respawn point provided by the second player is absolutely crucial to victory in this game.
I’m not sure I understand the actual OP - is it that when you play BR3 Japan you never get into the BR1-3 bracket, whereas with other countries you sometimes do?
I agree - however the reason there are few Japan players is down to Japan’s tech tree just being small and mostly uninteresting to the wider population.
That is unlikely to ever be fixed of course - Japan just didn’t have the wide range of weaponry available to the much larger factions.
I’m not sure I understand the actual OP - is it that when you play BR3 Japan you never get into the BR1-3 bracket, whereas with other countries you sometimes do?
he is mostly angry that is only one that gets +2 MM on BR3 when all others mostly get ±1BR MM
I agree - however the reason there are few Japan players is down to Japan’s tech tree just being small and mostly uninteresting to the wider population.
small tree, lots of uptiered weapons, lots of proto weapons, shit tanks and relatively bad maps(maybe that is just me).
That is unlikely to ever be fixed of course
completely agree
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa564/fa5642e1fa9378456306d80c56d7b4d6c9231944" alt=""
Think as if you were a new player, just got into br3,
Ah! But there’s your issue! Newbies don’t belong in BR III. As a community, we should be telling them to stay in BR II where they belong till they’re good enough for High Tier matches. News flash, newbs can’t handle High Tier matches regardless of if they’re going in with full III, one III item, or even full V loadouts. It’s an absolute sweat fest and we should be encouraging them to stay out of it till they are ready to handle it
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37ea8/37ea834557c5ce5ccfc363beda3ee2c05f38dc33" alt=""
he is mostly angry that is only one that gets +2 MM on BR3 when all others mostly get ±1BR MM
He’s literally wrong about this though. His entire perception of reality is based on a stupid UI decision and not what the developers, CM, and helpers have all said