Its much better to give Japan buff to type 4 with 9 cm Rocket specially for BR III where you gonna face Jumbos vs BR IV while Ofenrohr will be BR IV weapon and Japan needs BR III anti tank weapon.
Just buff the current type 4 with 9cm Rocket giving it 120 mm of pen and move it to BR III instead of giving same weapon for all and for BR II we can have:
80-mm Navy AT rocket launcher:
Dont be lazy devs … come on…
This one for BR IV
and for US faction also the British one:
USSR:
So we have unique anti tank weapons for all factions but the devs prefer the lazy way …
Necessary BR3 AT addition for Japan aside, problem will all of these is - there are just as fake.
So devs would spent excessive (by modern Enlisted standards) amount of work just to add different flavor of paper.
I do appreciate their honesty on the matter, but taking 2 years do Ctrl+C Ctrl+V a panzershrek is not okay.
Goodness knows how long it will take them to copy Zh-29, STG or Granatwerfer 42 to Japan.
sorry, my beloved emperor, but you are wrong in the second one, disgrace for myself, but it’s not 80 mm
extracted from
Well you have Type 5 for BR II for heavy armored targets and for less armored you will use this one I better have 120 mm penetration at BR III then 80 at BR II.
I agree with that
Not to mention US have BR II bazooka with 60mm armor pen and 8cm Navy anti -tank rocket laucher is very similar to US cant be more balanced then this and Type 4 with 9cm rocket 120 mm penetration will be very similar to M9. Very similar and balanced equipment.
The other option is type 4 20 jet gun but I really doubt infantry can carry this xD
my man you want kill us or what LOL
It can pen Super Pershing 
it will KABOOM it!
give me 2 of them!
I would like to know the specifications of this British AT Gun
Thats the spirit
| Country of Origin | United Kingdom |
|---|---|
| Type | Recoilless Gun |
| Caliber | 88.000 mm |
| Length | 1.741 m |
| Weight | 34.020 kg |
| Ammunition Weight | 7.37 kg |
| Range | 914.000 m |
| Muzzle Velocity | 183 m/s |
Contributor: C. Peter Chen
ww2dbaseThe 3.45-inch RCL Mk 1 recoilless rifles were designed by Dennis Burney and manufactured by Burney’s Broadway Trust Company. Their muzzle velocity was low for a weapon intended on being anti-vehicle weapons, but the high-explosive squash head (HESH) shells achieved good results against tank armor. Excessive wear of the barrels during testing caused production delays, thus these weapons were not delivered to front line units fighting in Burma as originally planned.
The HEAT can pen up to 120 mm of armor
The HERSH can pen up to 180 mm of armor
Is the British AT okay, Did it stay in the Prototype phase?
Well the war ended it was not needed when it was delivered
