Why is the m1903A3 springfield ignored?

Suggestions
1

is historical and
i would gladly replace all my m1903 for this model

:grimacing:

2 Likes
2

yeah all those thousand of silver, sorry but while the most distinct of the 1903 outside the Pedersen who would notice. not good enough for even or premium it would clutter up the tech tree so how ? i mean we already have the air service, not tobe rude but why. it stats are not any better it would almost be copy paste. i guess they could give it to Japa who must have captured boat loads in the Philippineā€™s.

2 Likes
3

am i missing something here? it is already in the game.

1 Like
4

as i sniper rifle i believe he wants none scoped for infantry

1 Like
5

no
is not there. :expressionless:

they put a scope on it.
that doesnt do it for me.

6

im tired of the normal springfield iron sights
:expressionless:

and br1 and 2 need some love too.

Jungle carbine
M1903A3

:relieved:

but no
they put a scope on it.
and the iron sight is not fixed,
it still has the old zoomed ADS
and the iron sight needs a rework too.

so i cant use it if i remove the scope.

im tired of those gold prototype weapons never used in battle.
and then i think, hey you still miss this thing.

if squad44 or easy red 2 have it
why not Enlisted ?

7

well yes,
i would love an m1903A3 too.

image
image1920Ɨ1080 645 KB

but the sight needs some serious re-work :nauseated_face: :

image
image1920Ɨ1080 445 KB

3 Likes
8

well A3 was primarily used as sniper rifleā€¦

1 Like
9

and since when enlisted has cared about real life classification or usages of things?

come on now.

i donā€™t see whatā€™s wrong with having an actual low br bolt action that are not the default springfield, or the usmc. ( that is, from us origin )

1 Like
10

well i dont care as long as it is introduced as foldered weapon.

3 Likes
11

now weā€™re talking :smirk:

2 Likes
12

love for the krag-jorgonsen do i need to star a campaign.
https://www.quora.com/Was-the-Krag-Jorgensen-used-in-WW2. [

Springfield Model 1892ā€“99

yeah i know barley ww1 but i want my krag

1 Like
13

that was the a4 :neutral_face:

14

as you can see is so neglected it still has the awful zoom
and yes
that aperture needs to be enlarged :rofl:

1 Like
15

i ask once again, anton pls 1903A3 springfield with peep sight and that funky warner and swasey scope from WW1 considering both the irons on the current springfield and the scope for

1 Like
16

well
it needs an adaptation for videogames.

:sweat_smile:

2 Likes
17

i donā€™t think it does.

just a different fov and slighty back view should be enough.

like the m1a1 carbine or the reising smg.

1 Like
18

look at the aperture
is too small

in a zoom out you would see anything.

19

am I the only person who thinks the BR1 0 star 1903 Springfield is amazing? it has clean sights, 830/ms velocity and almost perfect accuracy. Reload animation is fine as is rate of fire. I use this over most and some squads have the Lee-Enfield just for more ammo but I feel like using that gun is inferior with aim and no where near as clean sights as the ā€œstockā€ 1903 Springfield.

1903-springfield

1 Like
20

i use the m1917 enfield
the p14
and the m1903 springfield

i understand the criticism towards aperture sights
but you know
is a matter of practice :upside_down_face:

at first i was like you
but i started using the enfields
and end up liking them :face_holding_back_tears:

so i want aperture sighted springfield. A3
cause 1 is historical
and 2
this is enlisted
you cant say no to a weapon
specially a boltie. :smiling_face_with_three_hearts:

in my opinion the best sights in videogames
are the likes of the kar98k