maybe for ranged shots which is to try and mimic how far snipers commonly shoot, we are fighting pretty much point blank, so sniper rifles have lower damage falloff but it doesn’t explain why m91, m91 with grenade launcher, and m91 dragoon all deal 17.2 point blank, all KAR98k does ~16.2 point blank, both mp38 and mp40 deal same damage which makes sense as they are literally the same gun, mg34 with 75 deals the same damage as normal mg34. do you see where i’m getting at with constancy?
I see your point, but personally I think that lower damage output is a minor problem with the M2 compared to recoil and aiming. I mean, I end up using it to spray at close range anyways, so if it occasionally takes 3 bullets instead of 2 to kill a dude it’s not noticeable since I’m hosing him with 5 to 10 rounds bursts every time.
If I’m to fight at medium-long range, I’m definitely better off with a Garand in any case.
Thank you, maybe i will try G14 in near future, but it should be shown in G14 description.
I’m not in the USA - so I guess it is someone else needs a wee sleepy-byes… make sure there isn’t a pea under the mattress tho’! 
Everyone is freaking out that the M2 damage is less than a grease gun, yet no one is accounting for the fire rate difference? We are talking 400-430 compared to 560. You are likely still going to drop someone using a grease gun if you have an M2, and if it’s because you are changing to single fire mode, well then thats your problem.
My bad, past posts of yours made me assume you were from Freedumland
Edit: stupid forum duplicating posts
My bad, past posts of yours made me assume you were from Freedumland
this is information i was looking for