Maybe that I have misjudged you indeed, and I have to apologize for that. It is true that german players can be quite… delusional, just by reading your example about the tiger and their “pain” in Moscow, which is lie, because their tanks and plane are far more superior to the USSR.
However, you cannot deny the fact that it isn’t about IQ that Germany is losing all the time in Berlin. Maybe things will change for germany when they’ll release the full progression system in this campaign, or maybe that it won’t matter. But for now, it is obvious that IQ has nothing to do in that. Panzer IV J were the main tanks available to germany in Berlin, as they were literaly the downgraded version of the Panzer IV H, as it didn’t cost much to produce. So, historically speaking, the T-34-85 is far superior to the Panzer IV J as Rockaroo said. A T-34-85 could literally aim anywhere it wants on the panzer IV J to one shot it. While on the other hand, you need to be a bit more accurate with the Panzer IV J. So, how do we fix that? We don’t, because replacing the Panzer IV J would be weird, and that is why I have literally no clue how to fix that.
What is the issue if you do not have any tanks on your team? Well, pushing is going to be extremely hard, same case for defending your position, as your IA won’t take cover while being shot at by the machine gun of the T-34. And you would tell me that germany has good bombs and panzerfaust as well, but… the USSR players knows how good the T-34 it is, so just take one of them down, and an another tank will come to crush the defences of germany.
This is giving me a headache, I swear. How can we balance a campaign, where a nation lost? Where a nation barely had any fuel or any kind of ressources to fight against the ennemy? We shall see in the future. I didn’t mention anything about the weapons yet, I leave it to you all for now.
RPM doesn’t mean anything, just look at grease gun vs mp34
there is nothing PC about it though you’ve made posts about germany suffering in moscow, saying allies are spoiled, wanting the tiger, admitting you only play germany, and saying that the fg is weaker to the m2c despite them being in 2 different classes, m2 is basically an smg while fg is an lmg.
love to see wehraboos crying on forum ! . Actually team that prevails on Berlin campaing is those who have progresion and other squads as team with basic squads is having harder time… Panther is far better than T34 and Germans being on the defensive gives them edge … Battle for Moscow is something Soviets tends to win more becouse im playing it while Normandy i see Germans wining like 90% of time !
If u think Berlin is perfectly balanced, then accroding to your standard, you wouldn’t mind give germans Panzer F, Stg 44(they have similar DPS), just like you said, RPM doesn’t mean anything and we would be happy to drive Bf109 without any bomb. And you still said nothing substantial about my post, I highly doubt you are a kid because the way you speak is barely reasonable.
it’s ok, all of us make mistakes it’s what makes us humans. though we could replace 34-85 with either a 76mm version or the 57mm version, alternately they could get su-85 so the soviets can keep their 85mm gun but have it in a turretless vehicles. same could be done in the jumbo on normandy where we replace it with a 105 sherman
never said anything about it because i am refusing to make an opinion on something that is still in CBT and haven’t played much of.
by panzer f i assume you pean panther f which was removed for either historical or balancing reasoning, and mp44/stg44 was in the berlin test last year so they have a good chance of entering the game and i believe last year the german standard infantry started with a volksturmgewher.
if you ignore my first post explaining on what the likely reason could be
I just said I’m playing both side, and I’m usually on the side of the allies, are you able to read? I mean, if I’m defending the germans, it is for a good reason, while you on the other hand isn’t objective at all. I’m level 10 with the USSR so far, and level 7 with Germany at the moment in the Berlin campaign. We played quite a few games you and I on the same side, and you were a german yourself at the beggining of the OBT.
I played on Berlin during the CBT and OBT as well, on the URSS side again, a good tankist can easily destroy a Panther if you know where to aim, which is the hatch, or the turret, but the turret won’t be that easy to penetrate. Panther against T-34-85 is perfectly balanced. However Panzer IV J against T-34-85 isn’t, but it is historically accurate.
Since I’ve seen this for a thousand times I don’t want to say anything more about it here, but just to point out a simple fact: the vertical recoil per second of PPD is 168, and for MP40 is 161. And DPS of the former is 101, and for MP40 is 64.6. What a “perfect balance”.
Yes, they’re both perfectly adequate at putting people down, thank you for confirming that
The MP-40/1 is a great gun and I honestly prefer it unless its an indoors map.
Do you own it?
What I mean is simple: PPD 40(at least the version in Premium) is better than MP40/1 in almost every aspect, not just “two good things”. If this logic of “two good things” is okay, then there would be no balance problem in this game, since almost everything which is not a boltaction rifle is a good thing. The vertical recoil per second of PPD is 168, and for MP40 is 161. And DPS of the former is 101, and for MP40 is 64.6. Let alone PPD/40 has a larger magazine.
Okay and?
I don’t give a fuck if one is better than the other stat wise. They’re both great guns.
I’m telling you what they do in game, not how the stat card says they should do.
This is on par with crying that he k98 does 14 damage and mosins do 15 when they both work absolutely fine.
while Normandy i see Germans wining like 90% of time !
