bro you alredy have the AVS which have similar rof to fg42 to beggin with just 5 rounds less along the fact is has Low recoil and then you have the standard AVT 40 20
isnt that enough? really isnt it? you guys alredy have the best SF on the game which turned meta upside down once again and you wanna more?
Avs is quite inaccurate - I can’t even hit the target at 50 meters. So for me it kind of meh.
20 rounds AVS give at least an opportunity to fight in close combat as well as FG-42.
Have 20 rounds is a base for a comfort gameplay. I spend 1500 messages topic just to explain that simple truth - and don’t want to start over and over again. Hope you all understand that
0.22 to 0.18 accuracity??
wut kind of problem is that :_: it goes even far away from skill issue more like RNG issue and i guess that is relationed to ur perception but in reality ur are wrong : V
ofc it is but thats why i always asked for a 20 rounds mag for AVT, also you really love to mention the cqb combat when it comes to FG42 but gotta mention that most combat into the game is always on mid ranges where you more likely get cooked my more precise weapons and btw even on close ranges by taking 5-10 steps back ur armor will have the same effectiveness as when FG42 was nerfed and yet most CQB is on that distances of 10-20 meters and almost never below 5 meters since bots will more liketly shoot ur back fater or use melee so more than 5 meters is the ideal always to clean whole rooms
Can I say somewhere I’m playing well? no, I’m just an average player, but okay I want some comfortable dnd also I’d like to choose. Because now. For Soviets avt for 20 rounds is the only option. No one will take avs for 15 rounds, it’s a big difference so. In this case, I can’t see any ways. Besides, add an avs for 20 rounds. And only then will be a pretty equal position fg-42 fg-42-2.
For the close combat purpose. Fg-42 with rate of fire 1000 will be much better than something with the rate of fire 660. I don’t know. What else can I say even even if avs for 20 rounds will be added? It’d still be less rate of fire so less effective in close combat, I don’t know actually what else to say.
why would you choose FG42 over the FG42 II ??? tbh the first version is a big nerf it has way more dispersion and recoil to beggin with the rof is a curse and this statement proves why im trying to say:
an knowing that also the devs gave the Same dispersion that avs has to avt 40 20 it makes me think that they will do the same with avs with 20 bullets basically increasing the powercreep
Well, I have only one solution for you this way, if FG-42 don’t have enough fire power (for me its amazing)
Simple switch to any other nation and thats what i did im “rushing” soviet TT but since im to lazy it will take me a while maybe this year i manage to finish it
This is unfortunately a skill issue from you. You can’t buff a weapon until EVERYONE can use it. The point is to learn how to use a weapon.
Can you stop asking for weapons ? You already have the best weapon in the game, the AVT 40 20.
AVS already has way better accuracy and damage compared to FG 42 II . A weapon can’t be best in everything, not even in most of it. You can’t ask for 20 bullets magazine while having all these advantages
Man u just have a massive skill issue, get gud at the game, stop blaming the weapon. I have 200 ping and perform just fine with any weapon given. Maybe stop blaming the weapon first, and think that maybe i have a skill issue. That is how u get better in games and in life 
. U already have the lower dispersion and higher dmg, higher bullet velocity. U have already ruined the gun by giving it 880 RoF, because of mentality of higher RoF = Better gun, which clearly has shown it isn’t. If u wanna talk realism. Ur gun should break apart after 1 magazine of full auto
I’m not the worst player, 5 years is 5 years. How long you play in this game? I feel it inaccurate and have a right to admit it.
More content is good. This game lives as long as new content is coming. AVS for 20 rounds will be fine
But FG 42 have higher ROF even with compare to AVS. So after AVS for 20 rounds will be added - there will be still advantage for FG 42 in close combat. At the distance as I sad AVS quite inaccurate weapon.
Is this some kind of a clan teamwork at the forum? Why write almost the same as your friend? I know I’m talking about - AVT is much more accurate weapon - I make a good shots with it at the distance. With AVS I cant.
Sure you 45 can play even with a Kar98 at br 5. But don’t advise to common players something about an issue will ya
You could ask for more opinions on the weapon first, see how other people feel about it. You will find out that the AVS is anything but innacurate.
I agree, more content is good. But that doesn’t mean the new content has to be better than anything that was released before. We are talking about power creep here.
Again, you are focusing on the ONE thing that FG 42 has an advantage in, and you want to take that away / minimize it aswell. You should understand that your weapon is not supposed to be best at everything. Yes, the FG 42 is better in close quarters, and that’s it. Everything else, you name it, it’s worse, way worse than the current avs right now
I speak with a real veterans of this game and heard the same as I feel. If I will need to know how the rokies feel - I do.
I’m talking about option to chose. Axis now have this option - between FG42 and FG42II. AVT 40-20 is a way better then AVS, so let the factions have this right - to decide.
As I say AVS less effective at the distance then AVT 40-20. So FG is better at close distance and AVS is less effective at long range. That’s my opinion
Nope, they just gave me to look at this post. Maybe us having the same comment is because it is true.
So with your thinking right now. Should SMGs then be buffed? Just because I use an SMG at mid-far range, I blame the SMG for being trash. Not because I am foolish to use a weapon that is not made for mid to far range. So Plz buff SMG.
Hmm I cant seem to time explosive packs properly as well. Surely the explosive pack is defective, I think we should have a gigantic timer that helps me countdown to 6s. Or maybe bring back to function that automatically throws it before exploding?
If you wanna bring up PERSONAL accounts from Soldiers, that like saying we should therefore take biased and unresearched recounts. That is like going to take a recount from the Amercian Soldiers from Korean War. The issue proposed was that the Chinese Army Clothing was armour, just because they didn’t die after 1 shot. So then should we be taking in these kind of accounts?
Do you see how absurd claims can be used to turn any arguments and suggestions into irrational ones
Please give numbers and names. I am very sure I can get more numbers on my side of the claim
Why then in BR 5 do I see almost EVERY BR 5 game Axis side, people who have access to both options, just decide to use the FG42II?, just because there is an option to use. Doesnt mean it should. That is like saying using an AR is an option in competitive, but just because it is, doesnt mean it will be used.
You can do whatever you want - forum is a place for discuss. And if you took some beginners from '23 - I didn’t mind though.
So now we have an option to choose - which weapon to play with for axis - FG42II or FG42. I played against RenDeyl your boyo and he was armed with FG 42. Pretty effective I must say.
What option we have for soviets - more accurate AVT with a 5 more rounds. Or little higher ROF AVS but less aqurate and less rounds. What should I choose? Hmm there is no option now at all
Stop tunnel visioning into the fact that the FG42 has a high RoF and a 20 round mag. It literally is has 0.25 dispersion compared to 0.18 which is a HUGE DIFFERENCE. U will literally miss 1/4 of your shots because of this, making the effective magazine size lesser.
It is clear your “5 Years” of playing this game didn’t help with ur ability to analyze guns or have game knowledge
If u want to know even the difference on why the mag size is the same for the FG42II and FG42. It is because the FG42II has 0.22 dispersion, compared to 0.25 dispersion on the FG 42.
Let us ignore the fact that the AVT and AVS has higher Bullet Velocity which matters in mid-long ranges. And helps me who has 200 ping avg, because that means less time to kill. And also that for hipfire, the AVT/AVS has 15.0 spread increase vs FG42II/FG42 has 23.0 spread increase? Maybe look more at all the stats of the weapon before being too quick to point out the cons of guns. Be quick to listen, slow to talk, and slow to anger
