also comes with new proto weapons hehehe
1 Like
I hope they’ll make it without even more bugs. That’s literally all I care about at this point.
1 Like
Obviously. Because apparently you can’t have fUn without paper and prototypes.
AK-45 “early” for Soviets to run around in Berlin and ruin it even more, and Japanese paratroopers with compact and convenient 100 round “lend lease” MG-42.
2 Likes
It’s not about fun, it’s about more content for live service game.
Even WT had policy to implemented only vehicles that actively participated in battles. Obv, that has changed.
I wouldn’t be surprised at all. “We gave players what they asked for, we listen to the community”
4 Likes
This is the latest “news”.
Prior to this (during the second to fourth development of the beta service), despite the fact that a lot of people, like me, demanded the restoration of the br for abused items.
But the developers chose to refuse to listen. They even stated that they didn’t think anything bad would happen.
I am in the “abuse it until they fix it” camp.
The best way to accelerate changes is to make it such a big problem they have to fix it.
Gotta multiply the people who complain about it.
2 Likes
Well let’s be honest with ourselves - even with all the damned prototypes, cursed fakes and paper mockups, we are talking about a game that focuses on the past, in this case for now WW2.
There’s going to be a ceiling anyway where even the weirdest stuff has run out.
Meanwhile, WW2 is also one of the richest sources of content there is, even without fakes.
To me personally a game doesn’t need “content” to be awesome, just thinking of BF1 - I still play it to this day.
I believe a well done WW2 game with 50 weapons is better than fictional clownfest with 500 weapons just for content sake.
But ok off the top of my head the devs can add a dozen iconic new maps from Odessa and Khalkhin Gol to Anzio and Market Garden even for existing factions, plus there are the French (BR1-3) and Chinese with a plethora of maps, vehicles and weapons, and there’s also the possibilities of British and Italians as separate factions.
In the end, when all the “normal” stuff from WW2 is finished, I would personally prefer a new chapter either to the future (Korea/Vietnam) but even more so to the past (WW1/Interwar) without mixing with WW2 queues, rather than destroying WW2 for a decade with 1947 secret prototypes.
And that’s why I don’t play WT.
1 Like
doesn’t matter if you’re still playing it, it matters if you have a reason to put money into it.
I’d also prefer if they now devoted all their resources to bug fixes and to polishing game overall.
But we finished the event a few days ago. Now we don’t have any, and some players are starting to feel like there’s not much point in playing now.
Which also alreaey has tons of weapons (including protos and rare ass weapons and all sides could spam enemy’s weapons) and was the least WW1 game I ever played with people spamming grenades, automatic weapons and semi-autos and both sides spaming tanks they didnt produce with next to no trench war.
But oh no. A Panther in Stalingrad.
But they don’t have the world record yet, like they do for WT, maybe they stop after they get it 
you will get used to the wait 
Yeah been sitting in game, just cant seem to press to battle button, it like why do heaps of grind now, when i wait and do 2x things at once.
also i have 4x BR v army’s now, i don’t know which i want to be playing
1 Like
I said it was an awesome game, not historically accurate one.
Enlisted can be awesome for me if it covers all the major WW2 stuff without going mad ike WT.
Example of going mad.
2 Likes
New vehicles (SdKfz, T-34-85, Panther + King Tiger) fit better in Stalingrad than in Berlin.
Big open maps allow to use mobility of a tank and easily flank enemy.
I am happy with these changes 
You want make impact grenade became uselesss like phosphorus grenade again?? Lol no one use phospor again by now.
Enlisted gameplay is about brute force trying to push get active to rush objectives. not being passive just chilling worst than AI.
My opinions impact grenade spammer just ez to counter just shoot em play rush you need being aggresive to. and they lack hard to kill armor if full of impact 1 squad and backpack inventory are full AP personal mines. thats all my squad setup.
if you dont like just play GE or US and join them… wait till the dev give SU and Japs impact.
Apparently Enlisted needs to be awesome in terms of HA and not in fun for some reason even if HA is a dead cow.
Because fun is not allowed.
Fun is PPD-34 vs MP-38 somewhere in snowy USSR with T-26 and Pz 38t slugging it out.
That’s unique experience.
Bullshit assault rifles spam vs imaginary tanks can be found in other games like BF and CoD.
That is not fun.
1 Like
Japans as far I know they didnt have impact grenades but a grenade modded for be a trap,soviets not sure at all
They are gonna nerf it like the WP, and it’s going to have less radius than the Explosives. Mark my words.
To be honest, I am against directly weakening impact grenades.
I think the biggest problem is that players carry too many projectiles rather than too powerful impact grenades.
Too many is the main problem, with a squad of riflemen capable of throwing up to 27 impact grenades.
My personal opinion is to weaken the large grenade pack. Without the large grenade backpack, players can only carry 9 impact grenades at most.