Play Normandy or Berlin.
And maybe stick to one story, not two or three.
2 Likes
If we get that one gold order warcrime guy back, axis will win every battle
3 Likes
In fact, there are not many axial players in the Berlin campaign. Most of the time, the alliance players are killing BOT
It is what it is. Pretty much every campaign they add will be an Allies PVE campaign because either :
A) Oh look another Kar98K for me to unlock for the 100000000th time (No one wants to grind multiple campaigns with essentially the same gear)
Or
B) Oh look these weapons are trash (Tunisia and Pacific Axis weapons are made to be weak in comparison to Allies gear for whatever reason)
Insert Skill Issue Meme Here
1 Like
I find Berlin is usually a stomp one way or the other.
Last time I had to do a task for Berlin allies my teammates were useless.
1 Like
Also some Soviets complained about Berlin and if they complain, its balanced.
1 Like
You just need to “git gut”, ask forum specialists:
Rickyd123
LordBeaverbroke
_31420124242011
gastanofrizzi
They stated many times that this game is balanced and “skill and wehraboo issues” are the real problems.
Ok, tell me why when you 4 stack an underplayed faction, you suddenly start winning. Is it because now you are playing with players who actually gasp are good? Also, ping us next time coward.
If you are so dumb to dont use the official discord for find 4 player and stomp american in the pacific
Yes
Is skill issue
Because no wundergun gonna save a faction from a massive player migration
Dumb
The conflict of this game can not be solved by simply saying “skill problem”
Because the problem is not the player
However, it comes from the whole environment, which is “by a landslide”.
Players are like weights of the balance. When they rush to the other side extremely, it must be that there is something wrong with the balance
The camp where no one plays has some serious or not serious disadvantages and unfairness.
What I want is for developers to solve it and save the whole situation, not the so-called “skill problem”
It’s very simple. I can use my skills to win a game, but it doesn’t change the whole game environment. I just win. Then what?
Because I used my skills to win the game, is the lack of players in this camp solved? no
What we need is for developers to readjust the balance that has been tilted. If only to win the game, we only need to form a team. An experienced four person team can win most of the games, even the inferior ones
I hope they can really understand one question:
Why complain?
Not because you can’t win
It’s because the general environment has broken down. I don’t want to see this
1 Like
unless you force join any or unite the campaigns/playerbase, you wont be able to fix the game.
The Soviet army also had the same problem. They also used many duplicate weapons in the three campaigns, but their number of players was too much more than the number of Axis players
I complain because I hope developers can solve these problems. At present, the imbalance of the number of players has become the mainstream of the game
Of course, developers can continue to do this, and I will not continue to complain, because there are many such games, and I can play a better one
This is not a War Thunder. There is no substitute for it
20 years of game development and developer still don’t even look at other games to ez fix problems.
WHY IS THERE NO XP BONUS FOR EACH BOT ON YOUR TEAM??? WHY IS RUSSIA HE SO OP AND TAKE 30 YEARS TO BALANCE??? (100KG FORGE, 122MM HE)
Axis Berlin is horrible, you lose 70% of the time. I have played 40 battle recently and never saw a single KT or Tiger. It’s just bots vs players with 100% fully upgraded gear and 122mm that kills through 5 walls.
The playerbase is the problem itself especially during major updates on which campaign and faction gets the newest, coolest toys where they just flock to the faction that gets it then atleast a week or two later, back to reality once those players unlock the new stuff. Pacific is a whole different case with Japanese once their novelty died down, its full “America Fuck Yeah” mode because the Americans finally have their campaign where they don’t get stomped by STGs, FGs and Tigers along with their desert adventures with the British in Tunisia.
If you want to “strengthen” axis according to your terms, Normandy may get the FG42 II and King Tiger along with Tunisia with the Tiger H1 or even the Mkb 42(H).
I would love a coffee seeing the likes of you in Rising Storm 2 posting threads like “PuHlEaSe StReNgTheN PaVn/NlF/nOrTh ViEtNaMeSe” or “MuRikA tOo StRoNg” with the constant whining on balance instead of trying to deal with it or form a group to balance.
Have you considered the fact that Rising Storm 2 does not have an overwhelming player advantage, where one side is full of players and the other side is full of BOT?
I said that the camps with too few players have some balance problems
For example, T50 in Moscow and AVT in Stalingrad
Why can I exchange Level 1 gold card for a mid to late tank? In the early days of the German army, there was no countermeasure other than the use of aircraft? Why did the Soviet troops have automatic rifles in the Moscow and Stalingrad campaigns, but the German troops did not?
These balance problems finally led to the sad situation that the number of players would only flow to one side. The victory rate of my Stalingrad Soviet camp was 100%. I never lost a game from level 1 to full level. Because my enemies are all BOT
Or deal with those problems that have been complained about for a long time. I’m talking about the T50 that can be exchanged with gold card at level 1. If it’s not for this shit, the German army in Moscow should have more players
1 Like
Since you mentioned about Rising Storm 2 not having an overwhelming player advantage, sure none of the players are bots there but you can have an almost totally braindead team as South but they still have other offensive capabilities like napalm, spooky and helicopters which the North don’t have besides arty and tunnels that require a more competent team to maximize full potential. That besides players stacking South for better equipment and they could larp as an American GI fighting Vietcong.
Again this T-50 complaining in Moscow to no end despite T-28E and T-34 around when there are other vehicles that are a better investment with the gold card like the KV-1 and STZ in Stalingrad and Suvorov T-34-85 in Berlin that won’t be replaced by a future vehicle for the campaign unlike the T-50 where it will be replaced by better tanks when they unlock T-34.
If I’m Axis main, why would I play the worse version of my favorite faction if I can get the best Axis stuff in Normandy and Berlin? Kinda my case as Soviet why I prefer Berlin over Moscow and Stalingrad despite do play those campaigns too besides vehicle and map selection with my personal preference. This is a problem with the campaign system in general.
The issue with Stalingrad playerbase is because of the paywall where I have a separate thread regarding how to save Stalingrad campaign. Making the grind easier for less popular factions in less popular campaigns would’ve been the good motivator to get their taste of high level stuff instead of boosters where at times the game screws you over by getting a bad team, bad map and late join. Factions qualified on making the grind easier because of less popular and less strong include Moscow Axis, Normandy Allies, Tunisia Axis and Pacific Axis since Berlin have sweatlords for both Soviet and German while Stalingrad with this full access system.
Constantly complaining about Soviet automatic rifles but Germans do get assault rifles through the Mkb 42(H) anyway.
Wundergun at this point is going to be at a very high level anyway.