What if AT Gunners had access also to grenade launchers?

Suggestions
1

Currently Soviet AT Gunners have access to RMN-50. What if they had also access to such weapons as Diakonov or VPGS? Germans would get of course GGP/40 and Schiessbecher. What you think about such addition?

4 Likes
2

Pretty useless compared to other AT weapons so i wouldn’t mind if they add it to them

1 Like
3

Well, other AT weapons don’t have “rifle mod” and by decreasing your firepower against tanks, would increase firepower against infantry

4

I would do this, gives you even more a chance to kill a tank

5

What do you mean AT gunners? You mean ATR gunners?

6

dudes with Anti-Tank weaponry

7

I was thinking as replecement for PIAT or Panzerfaust

8

I like the idea. Which slot do you propose it uses? Would this be in the primary slot, in addition to the AT weapon; or would it replace the AT weapon?

9

You do realise you still have a gun you can use? That’s likely better than a mosin or kar98. So, that logic wouldn’t work.

10

I was thinking as replecement for PIAT, but after some proper testing it could be decided

11

You could have M2 Carbine, Garand and granade thrower for example

12

It’s a completely harmless suggestion, wouldn’t hurt balance in any way. Why not.

1 Like
13

Yeah, that’s probably the only reasonable combination that’s possible with this.

1 Like
14

Not everyone spams select fire rifles on every possible troop, though it’s sad that’s what people do

1 Like
15

How does this relate to any of what I wrote?

1 Like
16

this

1 Like
17

Yeah. And if you prefer to use bolts or semis, you’re likely gonna have a better one on your main slot and realyl don’t need another one. Or if you like the same gun that has the nade launcher, then you’re not gonna sacrifice an AT weapon to have 2 of the same rifle.
And if you do liek SFs, then you’re not gonna care either.
So the only real combinations I can see working here with this are either M2c + M1g nade launcher or M1g + M1c granade launcher.

1 Like
18

I’m talking about using the riflemen AT gun over the primary, not replacing the AT weapon

19

Pretty sure op meant replacing the AT weapon

1 Like
20

Oh, then that’s stupid

1 Like