I remember you couldn’t do that with my squad of stock mortarmen and snipers. You just left the battle.
Now all they need is the Ofenrohr and the T-44-100 and the Bomber compared to the Fw 190 D-12.
P.S. I hope BRIV will be separated from BRV. BRIII and BRIV are better balanced than BRII and BRIII or BRIV and BRV. This change would make BRII more enjoyable, improve the playability of BRIV and BRIII, and eliminate some controversial elements.
so we make br3 unplayable, more balanced does not mean balanced
sorry but if br4 can be down tiered to 3
but 3 can only be up tiered to 4
br3 becomes insufferable
yes it sucks to play br5
but as it is br4 can play br 5 4 3
br3 can play br2 3 4
sorry but no one is going to play br3 if it can only face br3 and 4
In my opinion, where German players suffer the most is in low BRs. I’ve picked up some PPSH and PPD there and they do perform better than Berettas and MPs. Another thing that intrigues me is why they don’t let you try out the premium squads from Germany like the other factions.
Why would they want something as bugged as the D12?
It’s Full Fuel problem, so it’s definitely a bit of a problem, but it’s one of the few Bombers that can do air-to-air combat as a Fighter.
That’s why the P-47 and Fw 190 are the best Bomber.
I hope there is a Bomber that can correspond to Fw 190 even if I don’t want OP like P-47.
An option to that would be the Do335, which was a fighter-bomber with a capacity to carry 1000kg of bombs and was very maneuverable.
It’s a Nazi plane.
All we need is Bomber from the USSR.
also japan too
Does DF have a Soviet bias, IMOP, yes, and you only have to look at the fact they are the only faction with body armor and the only faction with a fully weapons changeable paratrooper squad.
Japan is the only faction that has swords in TT
USSR is the only faction that does not have a gun larger than 100mm below BR4. Germans have 150mm at BR2, Americans have 105mm at BR3, Japanese have 120mm at BR3
Germany has an assault rifle with a silencer.
Germany and the USA have 500kg bombs
Japan has an 800kg bomb. The USSR does not have such bombs.
So how will bias be determined?
Japan is the only faction that has swords in TT
Swords are nowhere as powerful as universal Paratroopers or body armor.
USSR is the only faction that does not have a gun larger than 100mm below BR4. Germans have 150mm at BR2, Americans have 105mm at BR3, Japanese have 120mm at BR3
Out of context discussions about caliber are meaningless.
Germany has an assault rifle with a silencer.
Silencers have no value outside of the coolness factor.
Germany and the USA have 500kg bombs
Japan has an 800kg bomb. The USSR does not have such bombs.
Doesnt the SU also have 500 KG bombs?
Silencers have no value outside of the coolness factor.
airborne troops are also worthless. If we talk about the airborne troops, the USSR got them last. This is the only reason why the USSR airborne troops are what they are now, which is ironic, since the developers wanted to correct the German bias. I find this funny. The developers did not intend to release airborne troops equally for all factions, even when it was already clear about the merger/unification.
Yes, you are right, they gave me a bomb, I am not yet accustomed to the changes, I am writing something from memory.
Here is the context of 150mm guns. The funniest thing is that the Soviet shell has a higher flight speed, but lower armor penetration. For what reason is the shell better?
airborne troops are also worthless.
How so? Especially the universal soviet para squad is definitely part of the meta - since it can pick what ever meta gun it wants.
Also Paratroopers get extra vitality equal to body armor.
Sure it sucks that paras need to sacrifice their total ammo when they choose to spawn on the ground - but their ability to drop behind enemy lines → build quick rallies in the back → take out the enemies rallies from behind with little resistance → take out tanks that have no infantry support → apply pressure from the back…
just because Paras aren’t an instant win button when dropping directly into the objective anymore doesn’t mean paras are worthless - far from it, paras are the better guerillas, can build rallies and have AT weapons.
PPS43 Paras dominate BR2.
How so? Especially the universal soviet para squad is definitely part of the meta - since it can pick what ever meta gun it wants.
As long as they don’t have big ammo pouch by default like guerrilas, they will never be meta.
More with that toxic gimmick of having the only engineer in the useless mortar setup. And to top it off it goes to the second soldier in the order, not to a player. So there’s a pretty good chance he’ll die in the process.
And there are other disadvantages like being locked in long deployment, with possibility of your plane (now with mark = very easy to spot and shoot down) getting destroyed and you being dropped totally nowhere => putting you out of battle for even longer.
Paras are good only against passive teams that you don’t really need to use meta squads against.
Meta squads can be cycled without any disadvantages.
So how will bias be determined?
Well, the PPS-43 IMOP is over buffed, the Uragan is a level three smg impersonating as level two . The Soviets are the ONLY faction to have body armor, and the ONLY faction to have fully interchangeable weapons loadouts in its paratrooper squad. Is that bias, or just coincidental?
As far as Japanese swords in TT, I don’t see carrying a sword as much of an advantage or disadvantage, however the Japanese were issued more swords then other factions during ww2, and to be honest, the Sword I think is a traditional thing to the Japanese, NTM the Japanese would have literally nothing in the tech tree if this game were realistic.
Silencers, no advantage since silence in this game is not needed and they actually lower the damage hitting power of the weapon. You’re better off without the silencer IMOP. I don’t consider a Soviet 800 plus rate of fire smg an upgrade by adding a silencer and dropping the hit power from like 6.8 to 6.4, that just helps the Germans. I have the suppressed M3A1 Grease gun, and other then sounding weaker, it dropped the damage from 8.2 to 7.9, so not much of an advantage or Allied bias.
The bombs, take that up with the Dev’s as I know the Soviets used them and have no idea why they didn’t include them.
no and no
you are wrong in everything.
- the landing party has no ammo if it appears on the ground.
- to use it, you always need to parachute from an airplane, even if it is not required.
- the plane is marked, it is regularly shot down, at this point you lose any advantage in mobility.
- rally point = useless mortars. the player does not become an engineer, which means he can be killed.
- the squad is vulnerable during parachute descent, it is easy to lose most of the squad, or even the entire squad.
- cannot be in the gray zone, raids into it are out of the question.
the current landing is only needed for the rats, who are sitting in the far corner of the map on a pit with a machine gun
So B7A and J7 Shinden for Japan, IL-10 or Yak-9 for the Soviets, are the ones that seem similar to the P47 and FW190.
Hello, dear sir! As far as we get AVT for 20 rounds - everyone found it such a good gun, but the way for the begginers is far. I recently got some new pictures of an AVT for a 25 rounds. Could it be a premium squad of soviet specnas as AS-44 model 4 before? Or can it be an event gun - which will be given - one piece at hands - anyway it will be nice to have such a gun. From the NIPSWO report for 1943 AVT magazines for 20 and 25 rounds developed by the designers of the TSKB-14 Tokarev and Sus…
M-daaaa…
T-44 100 and copypasted MG42 with 150 bullets and better stadistics (both on TT)
150 round mag tt sounds great at br6
if it only exist but since it dont is basically powercreep for br 5