True, and those campy maps are usually the most hated
Definitely doable since we already have a shit ton of ww1 guns which are mostly not competitive (m1903, chauchat, m1907 and dragoon mosin, G98, lebel, MP-18, Beretta-1918…)
2 Likes
All of the above had service in ww1 xD
I would like more being covered (not the modern or futuristic stuff), yes!
Good ideas. Number 5 sounds the best to me
1 Like
While a WW1 might be fun I oppose it for the same reasons I do not like the idea of a Vietnam, or modern compaign.
1: To my knowledge there are already tons of arcade and realistic WW1 games; same situation with the other two campaigns I mentioned.
2: I would rather they focused entirely on WW2. Although I wouldn’t mind a modern game built on Enlisted’s engine down the road. But I would rather that be it’s own project, not related to Enlisted.
If you class federov as a AR then yes. But there were no select fires or many semis. They will be left to premiums, and gold
The only WW1 gamea are Verdun, and BF1. While the WW2 games are countless
1 Like
Tanneberg, isonzo, beyond the wire, other game…
2 Likes
No NO NO NO
WW1 goood very goood
Just a simple Szenario not much, maybe 3 Maps.
Trenches . Swords . Kar98.
DO IT its a DREAM from me, i dream about it already… DO IT
1 Like
Russian civil war would be interesting, especially with American Expeditionary Force fighting Bolsheviks in North Russia. The french fighting Bolsheviks in Southern Russia (Odessa)
1 Like
Would be great apart from bolts many weapons like shotguns,smg were also there in ww1, also don’t forget the weird looking tanks, mele weapons, and gas grenades and gas masks. WW 1 campaign would be really fun !
4 Likes
I honestly don’t think a WW1 campaign will be much fun. It would more or less be Moscow with only bolt actions (which I love, Moscow is my favorite campaign), but I have a feeling that people will still be bunny hopping and doing very un-WW1 like things.
Additionally we have to ask why there are not many WW1 games. You gave bf1 for arcade fun and verdun for realistic fun (I personally haven’t played any, please correct if I am wrong). But most WW1 games look alike. I don’t think that the majority of people will play because they like the feel of a WW1 campaign but because they like the cool guns that will inevitably come.
So I believe that the campaign would either die out really quick or be filled with prototype automatics to bring people in. And all of the sudden you have BF1 with less health and squads.
Tanneberg is verdun but eastern front
Well not is another game and the point you miss a lot of good ww1 game fps/rts
All without 5.It will bored.
In 4 red army vs white army.
I view the 4 th one the most boring. Since the same guns vs the same guns. The 5th would be really unique and offer a new perspective and weapons
You bad know civil war 1917-1922.
aaand it beginns…
And that is why i wrote WW1 and post WW1.
Aaaaand you go away.