Yes.
But as we know, this doesnāt stop DF from adding anachronistic stuff, such as jumbos, Fedorov, many strange gold weapons etc.
So at this pointā¦ š¤·
Except that the jumbo could have participated in the landing it was created the base for its
In the absence of a heavy tank for the planned landing in France, the Americans reinforced the front armour of a Sherman M4A3 (Ford engine), modified the suspension and changed the turret to obtain a breakthrough tank, capable of resisting the adversaryās blows. The last tanks of the series were even rearmed with a more powerful 76 mm gun. The price to pay was a significant loss of mobility.
Thereās a huge difference between highly unlikely, in theatre but not in combat and not even in fucking existence yet.
Could have. Did not.
Makes as much sense as Pershing or other stuff. Enlisted is full of censorship and anachronistic things already. Plus, Iām guessing they want to extend the time span of the Normandy campaign, such as making it include the Ardennes or other places.
the battle of the Bulge will be a campaign because the material is not the same in tanks and vehicles
We will see either way š¤·
Itās not like I absolutely want a specific vehicle over another, I donāt mind much at this point as devs release very random and sometimes not very well thought stuff.
But Iād take something different than a copy paste jumbo with simply a better cannon as only difference any day.
Already in play sherman easy 8 In basic model on editor
This pretty summarizes the issues of Normandy.
Just give them a good Churchill.
But not in Normandy. Only in Ital and Southern France.
he basic model is the A22 Churchill Mk.VII with the 75 mm Mk.V gun on editor probably for Normandy
You mean M1903, K98, Garand, G43, Tommy, MP-40, BAR, MG-42, Sherman, Pantherā¦?
Bulge is literally 2 tanks difference from āNormandyā, aināt no way itās becoming a separate campaign.
2 Likes
the tiger 2 h and the jadgtiger and the panther g and other tanks that did not make normandy and other weapons that are not available on normandy, for example the stg42 and the Panzerschreck 54
Yeah but the 90% of stuff on both sides is identical.
Personally Iāve had enough of Garands and Tommy guns.
Probably the same argument can be made about Stalingrad, but thatās probably WW2ās most iconic battle.
I definitely wouldnāt mind a snowy Bulge map added to Normandy though with its current equipment.
Panther G doesnāt matter and every small arm you listed could be in shitmandy.
Probably as Premium (though it could be the Jumbo as well).
1 Like
After like two campaigns?
Guess the fifth MP40 and third PPSh are less aids.
I Guess everyone like the kar 
for 5 time
At least Moscow has unique M38 with 20 rounds.
1 Like
I agree with the infantry weapons, but I would say no to the 262 unless you are willing to give the Allies a Meteor, which just clears the āif it existed, we can add itā threshold by entering service in the middle of Operation Overlord. However, Normandy is currently set up so that Allies has one less attacker and Axis has one less fighter, so I think that should be fixed. Allies get something like the P-61 or the B-26, and the Axis get something like an Fw 190D-9 or something, leaving both sides with 4 fighter and 3 attacker unlocks in the campaign. As for the KT and 76 Jumbo, both are probably fine balance wise, however I donāt think anyone really wants either in Normandy, especially with the beach maps.