What are some things you hate about enlisted?

Mess Room
23

this is a good thing in my opinion but only when the AI starts behaving properly. What I love most about the game is when attackers run towards you, I remember how WOW it made me during my first playthrough, but when the fight becomes close range it’s just… awkward. the bots stand there, they don’t even pretend to try to shoot at you…

yes, you can still play the squads you like, but as you play, you realize what is “actually” worth playing.
I think they should add more flavor and impact to the squad classes. Balance everything on the principle of counter-play. In the current state of game assaulters are simply the be-all squad. I hate that some classes/weapons/play styles are left out.

1 Like
24

i hate the pace it could be a little bit slower

25

Weird. As I remember, it was you who contradicted my suggestion to buff rifles on higher BRs.
From your past actions, it seems to me you want assault weapons to clearly dominate.

But whatever. Show me a multiplayer game with a huge amount of stuff where the meta isn’t just a fraction of a percent of that stuff.

Enlisted in particular is a game where you can play absolutely everything. Especially since that game is full of bots and casuals.
Some of your personal insecurities are not a flaw in the game.

I strongly disagree. Something like this could only be achieved by strong restrictions that would completely destroy what Enlisted is now. It wouldn’t be a ww2 sandbox anymore, plus the game would be far more compentitive. It wouldn’t solve the meta itself. Quite the opposite.
Enlisted would become another boring competitive game, with only one right solution to every situation.

1 Like
26

Yeah, I’m against it as you want to just move the problem to lower BR instead of actually solving it.
Now: SA are made obsolete by SF
After your change: BA are made obsolete by SA
Nothing really changes.

It’s only an ilusion of sandbox.
Yeah, you can play with whatever you want, just don’t expect to be equally as effextive/rewarded.

You can take a light bomber, but why would you.
You can take a worse gun, but why would you.
You can take a TD, but why would you.
You can dig trentch networks, but why would you.

Options are there, but they aren’t always worth using.

27

They attack the high fire rate weapons before in the past when I played stalingrad On Xbox I was on top of a building I use a bolt action rifle I could keep shooting bots whenever I wanted but if I use the high caliber machine gun which was high fire rate the bots magically snapped their necks to kill you and the same applies to flamethrowers because of the high fire rate that weapon has.

2 Likes
28

The low BRs would not be affected in literally any way. That’s you making a false accusation based on complete ignorance of what my proposal was actually supposed to be/do.

Weird. Since I still can be in top 3 in leaderboard with basically anything.
And funnily enough, rewards in the form of exps are calculated in the way so that even bad players are rewarded enough to motivate them to continue playing.
Which means it doesn’t really matter that much how good you are at the game.

1 Like
29

Low BR won’t be affected now. But if we get more queues (and I think we will due to big playerbase support), it will be detremental for BR2-3.
So lets say I just look at the balance one step further.

Yeah, but not with the same effort. Planes being a great example.

Agree here.
Though I’d say exp is not everything. I can get the same points as the guy before me but if I made them by dying more, I won’t be happy about this. Though I guess it’s subjective.

30

This is mainly due to the fact that the aircraft BRs are completely incompetently assigned. It’s just a bad balance that could be changed quite easily.

And then there are fighter planes with only machine guns. I don’t understand why they’ve been in such state for so long.
Since their only target is two other planes and there’s nothing else they can do.

3 Likes
31

Partially agree, but it’s not only due to bad BRs.

If I take plane with big/many bombs, it has the best effort/result ratio. Similarly with tanks etc.
Yeah, I can achieve similar results with other weapons, but I’ll need more effort. And BR won’t change this.

32

This is just another factor that could affect BR. It can be balanced properly.

33

Still, plane with less bomb = less worth using. With BR we just make it local instead of global. So instead of being the best out of 10 it’s best out of other 3 on this BR. Better but still bad. Not even mentioning uptiering etc.
Though maybe I have too big expectations.

34

Which is why all of your soldiers have them.
Thats consequent.

35

:question: AP mines are not limited, so I use them as they are now. They should be limited, but Im only a player, not a developer :weary:

1 Like
36

things i hate the most for me

  • lack of improvements to customs and lacks of basic custom games functions

legit, you can’t make a damn 1v1 or smaller pop maps. you have to dig the files, find the blk, and tweak it. when every game allows you to decide those settings through customs. no rotation for mods ( you gotta host each one individually ) no ability to remove the team balancer, no ability to lock teams, no ability to do many basic things.

  • no map maker

we can’t make maps from scratch. gib already

  • customization system being extremely horrid that i have ever seen in a free to play game

i don’t even know where to start, it’s just a messy, buggy and an ugly mess.
gotta buy the same piece across different campaigns for whatever reason on the same bloody soldier.
lacks of variety of the same uniform unlike stalingrad ( which is still incomplete too ), can’t wear gray uniforms for god’s knows what reason, can’t wear basic luftwaffe units outside mortars of normandy, paratroopers squads, machinegunners and some flametroopers inside berlin. overall system is pricey too. and don’t get me started with the lack of basic faction insignia or basic gray tank color for tanks.

  • no pves

i mean, can’t really hate that, because i somewhat get it. but i’m kinda tired of having to play under dog factions just to grind or get my bp task done while either no contributing, or not really having that fun.

i rather be able to do stuff against AI for perhaps 2/3 or 1/2 the xp from base game.
i’d recon could help newer players too to get used to the AI and get a feeling of the game.

which, technically, they are working on pves, but the bad kind. like, tower defense type of pve.

but maybe i’m just ranting.

anyway, that’s all for me.
enlisted is still for the most part, really great.

37

And we still cant lock certain brs from entering custom games even if we were promised that it would be an feature. Atleast pre merge i could limit the equipment by selecting early war campaigns but nowadays there is always an chance for an tiger 2 to appear in moscow.

2 Likes
38

shit you’re right.

it slipped my mind.

e q u i p m e n t
s e l e c t o r
w h e n ?

( let’s hope for this new major update :crossed_fingers: )

1 Like
39

Sadly it will probably be the last thing on their list. I also wouldnt be surprised if they locked the feature behind premium just like they did with password.

1 Like
40

Since when heaviest bombers are meta? Most players I play against quickly stop spawning them until I decide to crash lol. With tanks its a bit worse, as the maps do not allow for any smart play usually, sadly

41

By heaviest bombers I mean the most bomb mass, not mass of the plane itself. I later clarified.

42

Hate:

The fucking. Bipod. Functionality.

Current BR handling, where br 3 & 4 are kinda pointless from match making perspective and only there to be preyed on. I tend to stick to 2 or 5, basically.

Lack of choice of maps. Why i basically dont wanna touch high br soviets, too much Berlin.

Game going hard into the fantasy direction.

Playing against stacks.

Late joins the game.

Axis exclusive players :kissing_heart:

Like:

The basic game is very fun.