Weapons you want in the future

[Adamnpee]

@Blegh2022

Not unless you add someone like Finland who only participated in a small part of the war.
France could fight in multiple campaigns; Normandy, Tunisia, France (if French are added, the battle will be added), Invasion of Italy, Battle of Bulge, ect ect. Basically anything in Europe that isn’t Eastern.

Yeah, but they all should be just subbranches. If they were completely seperated factions, matchmaking would be completely screw up.

[Liah_Kim]

I want them all

[Man_bear_pig]

There are a lot of options in the future regarding multiple faction matchups while maintaining relative accuracy. Let’s say in the future we have Germany, Italy, Commonwealth, US, Soviets, Japan, and France. You could have Germany, Italy, France, Commonwealth, and the US all queue in Tunisia. If you expanded Normandy to the Liberation of France more generally you could likewise slip the French in alongside the US and Commonwealth.

I also hope we get to see some maps for Japan that pit them against low-BR Soviets in the future.

[Adamnpee]

@Man_bear_pig

Commonwealth, and the US all queue in Tunisia.

Yep, that’s what I am talking about. You don’t want to have so many "this faction + this faction combined can go only to this map etc. It would completely destroy whole point of merge.

They should just made them into sub factions that would still be in Germany faction and so on.

[Elisseo]

just made them factions

[CaptainSebekel]

I think at least Romania can be a own faction and just should be queue together with Germany against the Soviets while Italy serves as assistant for Germany against Western Allies.

[khtk395]

@CaptainSebekel

I think at least Romania can be a own faction

Lol Romania doesn’t have enough equipment to fill a tech tree with reasonable size. Unless you want half of the tech tree being copy paste equipment.

[SKWID22]

1. Suppressed m1 carbine designed for the SOE. Used between 1943 and 1945.
   
2. T20 Garand. Fully automatic Garand that had a select fire capability and took 20rd BAR magazines. It never left the production stage though.
   

[Blegh2022]

@Adamnpee

Yeah, but they all should be just subbranches. If they were completely seperated factions, matchmaking would be completely screw up.

How? How would having them be sub-branches any different than separating them.

[gastanofrizzi]

@Adamnpee ^

[CaptainSebekel]

Well. It kinda works with Japan.

[khtk395]

What do you mean? Most of the Japan equipment are not copy paste lol.

[CaptainSebekel]

Yeah I guess if you rename your cheap MP28, M1G, ZH, ZB and Italian copy-paste, it is a new gun.

[khtk395]

Lol, those Japan copy performs differently those are new gun lol.

[olek_z17]

@SexyTent

I want this in Gold order. (I watched Inglorious Basterds just yesterday)

As a melee of course:)

[CaptainSebekel]

So does the MP38 compared to the MP40 but I wouldnt call them totally sifferent weapons.

[gastanofrizzi]

@khtk395

Most of the Japan equipment are not copy paste lol

• 1 mp34, (Arisaka is a basically mp34 reskin)
• 2 mp28 with tweaked rof and mag
• type 97 is a zb scoped
• type hei is a zk29 with less 5 shoot and a better sigth
• type 4 is a worse garand
• type 1 is a carcano

And im forgetting something else for sure…

[khtk395]

@gastanofrizzi

• 1 mp34, (Arisaka is a basically mp34 reskin)
• 2 mp28 with tweaked rof and mag
• type 97 is a zb scoped
• type hei is a zk29 with less 5 shoot and a better sigth
• type 4 is a worse garand
• type 1 is a carcano

By your logic I can said every gun is copy paste.
MP40 is a reskin PPSH41 with 32 round with worse rof and fire 9mm bullet lol.

[gastanofrizzi]

@khtk395

By your logic I can said every gun is copy paste.

In fact they are with the actual gameplay, mod an mp40 with the same rof of the ppsh41 and what you get? A ppsh41 with another skin

[khtk395]

@gastanofrizzi

In fact they are with the actual gameplay,

Lol so your japan many copy paste weapon theory is not true lol.