I wish the people who played this game were actually interested in WW2 and not just broke f2p zoomerbois…
4 Likes
CoD’s weapons are all Frankenstein guns
Enlisted having rare, prototype, and experimental weapons is completely fine and not even comparable
Your bottom pic is a 1950s Soviet flamethrower so obviously it wouldn’t be added in game, but the Suomi definitely
Don’t forget the Mosin with the under barrel flamethrower
i think we still need to remember balance. drum mag smg with flamethrower attachment is just too much even if it would be limited to event reward. The as 44 was added just because the soviets needed an assault rifle to match the stg44.
I mean this game is asymmetrically balanced. I’m not one to say “Oh they have X so I should have Y”. We don’t need an exact one to one counter for everything.
It’s like we might as well not have the Luftfaust because the Allies and Soviets don’t have an AA launcher
Besides TTK is very fast in this game so you can just as easily deal with a Flame Suomi.
The Kulakov Grenade Launcher was a prototype Soviet multi-grenade launcher and I think we should have it in game, eventhough Germany has nothing one-to-one comparable
Point is overall I don’t think a Flame Suomi would be too much for this already too much game, and it would be a nice addition to the sandbox
the game is fast paced with smgs and flamethrowers being the most suitable weapons. Adding an already good smg with flamethrower would be just too much for me. Im fine if they add it only for the mod editor but i dont want to see it in the base game.
think about it this way how little ammo would you get for the flamethrower and smg, also the flamethrower troopers already get the flamethrowers and rifles if you limit them to one combo weapon it’s not so bad, also if they have to spend a second switching from firing the smg to firing the flamethrower,